Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Theory & Practice. 2011. Issue 1
COLLECTION:    Philosophical Sciences

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

ECOCENTRISM WORLD-VIEW AND THE CONCEPTION OF SOCIETY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Sergey Petrovich Myakinnikov
Kuzbass State Technical University


Submitted: January 17, 2011
Abstract. In the article the position of the new ecological world-view (ecocentrism) is defined in comparison with the world-view guidelines of anthropocentrism and nature-centrism. Ecocentrist model of the sustainable co-development of the integrative complex of ecologically sound forms of consciousness, branches of spiritual culture and material production of society is offered. The main conditions of the sustainable development of such complex are enumerated.
Key words and phrases:
мировоззрение экоцентризма
устойчивое развитие
натурцентристское мировоззрение
антропоцентристское мировоззрение
экосфера
экосоциальный комплекс
ecocentrism world-view
sustainable development
nature centrist world-view
anthropocentrist world-view
ecosphere
eco-social complex
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Горелов А. А. Экология. М.: Юрайт-М, 2001. 312 с.
  2. Грищенко В. Н. Экологическая этика и заповедное дело // Заповiдна справа в Украiнi. 2001. Т. 7. Вып. 1. С. 1-8.
  3. Дерябо С. Д. Экологическая психология. М.: Смысл, 1999. 456 с.
  4. Осипов В. Первая попытка синтеза экоцентризма // Зеленый мир. 1994. № 7. С. 4-5.
  5. Уиттекер Р. Х. Сообщества и экосистемы. М.: Прогресс, 1980. 327 с.
  6. Biro A. Towards the denaturalized ecological politics // Polity. 2003. Vol. 35. № 2. P. 195-212.
  7. Brulle R. J. Environmental discourse and social movement organizations: а rhetorical perspective on the development of US environmental organizations // Sociol inq. 1996. Vol. 66. № 1. P. 58-83.
  8. Gladvin T. N., Kennely J. J., Krause T. S. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and reseach // Acad. manag. rev. 1995. Vol. 20. № 4. P. 874-907.
  9. Hanna M. D. Environmentally responsible management behavior: is ecocentrism a prerequisite ? // Ibidem. P. 796-799.
  10. Kaltenborn B. P., Bjerke T. F. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences // Landscape urban plan. 2002. Vol. 59. № 1. P. 1-11.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing