Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Theory & Practice. 2012. Issue 11-2
COLLECTION:    Varia

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

MEMORY IN HUME'S DOCTRINE ON CAUSALITY AND IDENTITY OF SELF

Konstantin Pavlovich Shevtsov
St. Petersburg State University


Submitted: October 22, 2012
Abstract. Hume's skepticism is constructed around two fundamental paradoxes: the paradox of causality and the identity of self. The empirical principle of the construction of science about man, stated in Treatise of Human Nature, leads to the recognition of the impossibility of the conclusion from cause to effect, as well as to the rejection of the substantial interpretation of soul and the definition of self as the connective of perceptions. The author shows that Hume's argumentation suggests the reliance on the internal causation of human nature, where memory and habit are its main evidence.
Key words and phrases:
память
привычка
причинно-следственная связь
тождество
сознание «я»
аффекты
предрасположенности
впечатления
memory
habit
cause-and-effect relation
identity
awareness of "self"
affects
predispositions
impressions
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Грязнов А. Ф. Разумный скептицизм в жизни и философии // Юм Д. Сочинения: в 2-х т. М.: Мысль, 1996. Т. I. 733 с.
  2. Юм Д. Сочинения: в 2-х т. М.: Мысль, 1996. Т. I. 733 с.
  3. Юм Д. Сочинения: в 2-х т. М.: Мысль, 1996. Т. II. 799 с.
  4. Stroud B. Hume (Arguments of the Philosophers). Routledge, 1977. 280 p.
All issues


© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishing