Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Theory & Practice. 2013. Issue 3-2
COLLECTION:    Varia

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

THE TURKISH MEDIA ROLE IN COVERING POLITICAL PROCESSES IN TURKEY AT THE PRESENT STAGE

Timur Nailevich Vagizov
Kazan’ (Volga Region) Federal University

Bulat Mukhamedovich Yagudin
Kazan’ (Volga Region) Federal University
Submitted: February 18, 2013
Abstract. The authors estimate the role of the Turkish media in covering political processes in Turkey at the present stage, analyze parliamentary and presidential elections in Turkey in 2007 and the media role in the election campaign with the help of the content analysis of the leading periodicals articles; and substantiate the theory of the “minimal effect” of the media, according to which all media campaigns aim only to urge voters to their initial prepossession.
Key words and phrases:
СМИ Турции
президентские и парламентские выборы Турции 2007 г
противостояние между исламистами и секуляристами в Турции
доверие населения СМИ
контент-анализ статей
освещение СМИ повестки дня
концентрация и монополизация рынка СМИ
«минимальный эффект СМИ»
the Turkish media
presidential and parliamentary elections in Turkey in 2007
confrontation between Islamists and secularists in Turkey
public confidence in media
content-analysis of articles
media coverage of agenda
concentration and monopolization of media market
“minimal effect of media”
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Alvarez R. M. Information and Elections. University of Michigan Press, 1998. 371 p.
  2. Ansolabehere S., Iyengar S. Going Negative: How Political Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. N. Y., 1995. 256 p.
  3. Ayten A. Media: Democracy Relations and the Reflection of Turkish Parliamentary Elections in the Turkish Print Media [Электронный ресурс]: working paper. URL: http://cim.anadolu.edu.tr/pdf/2003/17.pdf (дата обращения: 16.01.2012).
  4. Balkir C., Banducci S., Soyaltin D., Toker H. Expecting the Unforeseeable: the 2007 Turkish Elections in the Media // Turkish Studies. 2008. Vol. 9. № 2. P. 197-212.
  5. Bartels L. M. Messages Received: the Political Impact of Media Exposure // The American Political Science Review. 1993. Vol. 87. № 2. P. 267-285.
  6. Bu Da Halkın Muhtırası [Электронный ресурс] // Radikal. 2007. July 23. URL: http://www.radikal.com. tr/radikal.aspx?atype=radikaldetayv3&articleid=820628&categoryid=98# (дата обращения: 19.04.2011).
  7. Duzel N. Tarhan Erdem: ‘Ak Partisi’nin Oyu Yüzde 46-47’ [Электронный ресурс] // Taraf. 2010. September 20. URL: http://www.taraf.com.tr/nese-duzel/makale-tarhan-erdem-ak-partisi-nin-oyu-yuzde-46-47.htm (дата обращения: 17.01.2012).
  8. Dünya İstanbul'daki Tarihi Mitingi Konuşuyor.. İşte Başlıklar [Электронный ресурс] // Milliyet. 2007. 30 Nisan. URL: http://www.milliyet.com.tr/2007/04/30/son/sondun10.asp (дата обращения: 28.03.2012).
  9. Erdem T. AKP %48'e Dayandı, CHP %20'nin Altında [Электронный ресурс] // Radikal. 2007. July 19. URL: http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=227346 (дата обращения: 16.01.2012).
  10. Finkel S. Re-Examining the ‘Minimal Effects’ Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns // The Journal of Politics. 1993. Vol. 55. P. 1–21.
  11. Freedom of the Press: а Global Survey of Media Independence / Freedom House. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. 271 p.
  12. Gelman A., King G. Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable? // British Journal of Political Science. 1993. Vol. 23. № 4. P. 409–451.
  13. İstanbul ‘Darbe Ve Şeriata Hayır’ Dedi! [Электронный ресурс] // Evrensel. 2007. April 30. URL: http://www.evrensel.net/ v2/haber.php?haber_id=9086 (дата обращения: 28.03.2012).
  14. Laik Türkiye Için Çağlayan’a [Электронный ресурс] // Hurriyet. 2007. 29 Nisan. URL: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/ 6426626.asp?f=1 (дата обращения: 28.03.2012).
  15. Mcquail D. Mass Communication Theory: аn Introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2005. 621 p.
  16. Migdalovitz C. Turkey’s 2007 Elections: Crisis of Identity and Power [Электронный ресурс] // CRS Report for Congress. 2007. July. URL: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/rl34039.pdf (дата обращения: 25.02.2011).
  17. PM Erdogan Condemns Terrorism 'State Will Give Necessary Answer' [Электронный ресурс] // The Journal of Turkish Weekly. 2007. 11 June. URL: http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/45858/pm-erdogan-condemns-terrorism-state-will-give-necessary-answer-.html (дата обращения: 28.02.2011).
  18. Renaud Soufflot de Magny. Eurobarometer 62.0: Standard European Trend Questions and Sport. October–November 2004. L.: TNS Opinion & Social [Producer], 2004. 98 p.
  19. Ruken B. Media Landscape in Turkey [Электронный ресурс] // European Journalism Centre. 2010. November 5. URL: http://www.ejc.net/media_landscape/article/turkey/ (дата обращения: 25.11.2011).
  20. Secular Rally Targets Turkish PM [Электронный ресурс] // BBC News. 2007. 14 April. URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/europe/6554851.stm (дата обращения: 01.04.2012).
  21. Standard Eurobarometer 62: National Report. Turkey [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/ archives/eb/eb62/eb62_tr_exec.pdf (дата обращения: 14.11.2010).
  22. Turkey’s Elections General Facts [Электронный ресурс] // SETA Foundation. URL: http://www.setadc.org/ pdfs/Turkey_Elections_Fact_Sheet_2011.pdf (дата обращения: 22.05.2012).
  23. World Report: Turkey [Электронный ресурс] // Reporters without Borders. URL: http://en.rsf.org/report-turkey,141.html (дата обращения: 25.02.2011).
All issues


© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishing