Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Theory & Practice. 2016. Issue 7-2
COLLECTION:    Varia

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

PROBLEM OF ESTHETIC EXPERIENCE STRUCTURE: HISTORICAL ASPECT

Artem Evgen'evich Radeev
Saint Petersburg University


Submitted: July 1, 2016
Abstract. The article focuses on studying the basic philosophical conceptions of esthetic experience structure. For that purpose the author analyzes two basic structure models - phenomenological (by the example of R. Ingarden’s works) and analytical (by the example of M. Beardsley’s works) ones. In spite of the self-sufficiency of these models, their conceptions of esthetic experience structure have much in common. On this basis the author identifies foundations for the theoretical analysis of esthetic experience structure.
Key words and phrases:
эстетический опыт
феноменология
Р. Ингарден
аналитическая философия
М. Бердсли
esthetic experience
phenomenology
R. Ingarden
analytic philosophy
M. Beardsley
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Дземидок Б. Эстетический перцептуализм - эмпирическое направление в американской аналитической философии искусства // Американская философия искусства. Основные концепции второй половины XX века - антиэссенциализм, перцептуализм, институционализм: антология / под ред. Б. Дземидока, Б. Орлова. Екатеринбург: Деловая книга, 1997. С. 127-154.
  2. Шустерман Р. Прагматическая эстетика. Живая красота, переосмысление искусства. М.: Канон+, 2012. 408 с.
  3. Beardsley M. Aesthetic Experience Regained // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 1969. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 3-11.
  4. Dickie G. Beardsley’s Phantom Aesthetic Experience // Journal of Philosophy. 1965. № 62. P. 129-136.
  5. Dickie G. The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude // American Philosophical Quarterly. 1964. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 56-65.
  6. Fairchild A. W. Describing Aesthetic Experience: Creating a Model // Canadian Journal of Education. 1991. Vol. 16. № 3. P. 267-280.
  7. Ingarden R. Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1961. Vol. XXI. № 3. P. 289-313.
  8. Stolnitz J. “The Aesthetic Attitude” in the Rise of Modern Aesthetics: Again // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 1978. Vol. 36. № 4. P. 409-422.
All issues


© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishing