|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
|
|
ON L. WITTGENSTEIN’S CULTURAL RELATIVISM: PRO ET CONTRA
|
Nikolai Vladimirovich Medvedev
Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin
|
|
Submitted:
September 30, 2018
|
|
Abstract.
The article is devoted to the analysis of L. Wittgenstein’s arguments for their compliance with the position of cultural relativism. Some aspects of Wittgenstein’s philosophy stimulating the emergence of the relativistic readings of his texts are considered. The author proves that Wittgenstein’s epistemic contextualism should not be identified with the relativistic principle and the philosopher’s views should not be interpreted in terms of relativism. In the present study, Wittgenstein’s ideas are discussed in relation to the problem of intercultural communication. The Austrian philosopher is clearly aware of our dependence on a certain tradition of rationality and worldview; he takes into account the fact of the variability of language games and world outlooks over time. Wittgenstein, however, recognizes that there are universal prerequisites for the access to different cultures in the form of the similar patterns of human behaviour, which places his position beyond the principle of cultural relativism.
|
Key words and phrases:
культурный релятивизм
контекстуализм
языковая игра
форма жизни
слияние горизонтов
картина мира
cultural relativism
contextualism
language game
form of life
fusion of horizons
worldview
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Витгенштейн Л. О достоверности // Витгенштейн Л. Философские работы: в 2-х ч. / пер. с нем. М.: Гнозис, 1994. Ч. I. C. 323-405.
- Витгенштейн Л. Философские исследования // Витгенштейн Л. Философские работы: в 2-х ч. / пер. с нем. М.: Гнозис, 1994. Ч. I. С. 75-319.
- Касавин И. Т. Релятивизм [Электронный ресурс] // Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4-х т. Изд-е 2-е, испр. и доп. М.: Мысль, 2010. URL: https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASHa663349863a536e9cc6ca6 (дата обращения: 29.06.2018).
- Медведев Н. В. Герменевтическое понятие истины // Философские традиции и современность. 2013. № 1 (3). С. 89-95.
- Ниинилуото И. Критические замечания о когнитивном релятивизме // Вопросы философии. 2015. № 1. С. 40-44.
- Платон. Теэтет // Платон. Собрание сочинений: в 4-х т. М.: Мысль, 1993. Т. 2. С. 192-274.
- Barnes B., Bloor D. Relativism, Rationalism, and the Sociology of Knowledge // Rationality and Relativism / ed. by M. Hollis and S. Lukes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982. P. 21-47.
- Habermas J. On the logic of the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988. 220 p.
- Rorty R. Solidarity or Objectivity? // Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. P. 21-34.
- Silva R. Wittgenstein and the Problem of Cultural Relativism // Cultures: Conflict - Analysis - Dialogue. Papers of the 29th International Wittgenstein Symposium (August 6-12, 2006). Kirchberg am Wechsel, 2006. Vol. XIV. P. 319-321.
|
|
Русский
