|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
|
|
Return of Homo Politicus under Neoliberal Governmentality
|
Nikolai Pavlovich Zvolev
Russian State University for the Humanities
|
|
Submitted:
August 31, 2020
|
|
Abstract.
The article analyzes return of populism in liberal democracies from the viewpoint of Michel Foucault’s conception of neoliberal governmentality. The paper shows how neoliberalism managed to hegemonize discursive field of politics through rationalizing its power, by applying economic analysis to various forms of social relations. Such an analysis considered a human being as homo oeconomicus thus promoting appropriate social behaviour. At the same time, homo oeconomicus is not the only theoretical model. Scientific originality of the study lies in the fact that populism is considered through the prism of the governmentality conception, which allows identifying political causes for modern growth of populism. The research findings are as follows: the author shows that neoliberal governmentality, which ignored other theoretical models, unwittingly stimulated demand for these very models, first of all, the model of homo politicus, and it was satisfied by right-wing populists.
|
Key words and phrases:
homo oeconomicus
homo politicus
Фуко
правительность
неолиберализм
популизм
M. Foucault
governmentality
neoliberalism
populism
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Автономов В. С. Модель человека в экономической теории и других социальных науках // Истоки: вопросы истории народного хозяйства и экономической мысли. 1998. № 3. С. 24-71.
- Дин М. Правительность: власть и правление в современных обществах / пер. с англ. М.: Дело, 2016. 592 с.
- Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть. Избранные политические статьи / пер. с фр. М.: Праксис, 2002. 384 с.
- Фуко М. О начале герменевтики себя // Логос. 2008. № 2 (65). С. 65-95.
- Фуко М. Рождение биополитики / пер. с фр. СПб.: Наука, 2010. 448 с.
- Brown W. American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization // Political Theory. 2006. Vol. 34. № 6. P. 690-714.
- Brown W. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge - L.: MIT Press, 2015. 296 p.
- Crouch C. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity, 2004. 144 p.
- Goodwin M., Heath O. The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregate-level analysis of the result // The Political Quarterly. 2016. Vol. 87. № 3. P. 323-332.
- Goodwin M., Milazzo C. Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit // The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2017. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 450-464.
- Hay C. Brexistential angst and the paradoxes of populism: On the contingency, predictability and intelligibility of seismic shifts // Political Studies. 2020. Vol. 68. № 1. P. 187-206.
- https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/atmwrgevvj/TimesResults_160622_EVEOFPOLL.pdf (дата обращения: 20.06.2020).
- https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/full-text-donald-trump-inauguration-speech-transcript-233907 (дата обращения: 20.06.2020).
- Lemke T. “The birth of bio-politics”: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality // Economy and Society. 2001. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 190-207.
- Norris P. Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 350 p.
- Post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics / ed. by J. Wilson, E. Swyngedouw. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014. 336 p.
- Rockler N. R. “Be your own windkeeper”: Friends, feminism, and rhetorical strategies of depoliticization // Women’s Studies in Communication. 2006. Vol. 29. № 2. P. 244-264.
- Rüstow A. Organic policy (vitalpolitik) versus mass regimentation // Freedom and Serfdom. Dordrecht: Springer, 1961. P. 171-190.
- Schultz T. W. Investment in human capital // The American Economic Review. 1961. Vol. 51. № 1. P. 1-17.
|
|
