Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2013. Issue 10
COLLECTION:    Philological Sciences

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

ON QUESTION OF RELATEDNESS OF BIOLOGICAL SEX, GRAMMATICAL GENDER AND GENDER

Inga Borisovna Vasil'eva
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University


Submitted: September 27, 2013
Abstract. The article studies the question of correlation between gender dichotomy (femininity / masculinity) with the dichotomy of gram-matical gender in languages (feminine/ masculine). The theory of semantic symbolism is considered from a critical point of view. It is proved by the material of the examples of nouns morphological classifications from different languages that biological de-terminism is not a factor that adequately explains the origin of gender category in language. Consequently, it is crucial to distinguish between the notions of grammatical gender and gender in contemporary gender studies, and to delimit these two notions from the notion of biological sex.
Key words and phrases:
гендер
мужественность
женственность
гендерная дихотомия
грамматический род
биологический пол
семантический символизм
gender
masculinity
femininity
gender dichotomy
grammatical gender
biological sex
semantic symbolism
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Иванов Вяч. Вс., Топоров В. Н. Славянские языковые моделирующие семиотические системы. М.: Наука, 1965. 251 с.
  2. Ивыгина А. А. Наименование лиц женского пола в русских говорах Волжско-Свияжского междуречья: структурно-семантический аспект // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. Тамбов: Грамота, 2013. № 6 (24): в 2-х ч. Ч. II. C. 93-97.
  3. Кирилина А. В. Гендер: лингвистические аспекты. М.: Институт социологии РАН, 1999. 189 c.
  4. Cameron D. Verbal Hygiene. London – N. Y.: Routledge, 1995. 264 p.
  5. Corbett G. G., Fraser N. M. Default Genders // Gender in Grammar and Cognition / ed. by B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and monographs (124). Berlin – N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. P. 55-97.
  6. Gender in Grammar and Cognition / ed. by B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs (124). Berlin –N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. 836 p.
  7. Hurskainen A. Noun Classification in African Languages // Gender in Grammar and Cognition / ed. by B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs (124). Berlin – N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. P. 665-688.
  8. Key M. R. Male / Female language. The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Metuchen, N. J., 1975. 196 p.
  9. Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press, 1990. 614 p.
  10. Leiss E. Gender in Old High German // Gender in Grammar and Cognition / ed. by B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs (124). Berlin – N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. P. 237-258.
  11. Olivares C. Sex and Language // The Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics / ed. by R. E. Asher, J. M. Simpson. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1994. Vol. 7. P. 3868-3872.
  12. Romaine S. Communicating Gender. Mahwah – N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999. 409 p.
  13. Unterbeck B. Verbal Classification and Number: A Case Study in Navajo (Athapaskan/Na-Dene) // Gender in Grammar and Cognition / ed. by B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs (124). Berlin – N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. P. 401-460.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing