Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2018. Issue 12-3
COLLECTION:    Linguistics

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

STRATEGIES OF INAUTHENTIC SPEECH AGGRESSION IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT

Tamara Shamilevna Gabdrafikova
Moscow City University


Submitted: December 28, 2018
Abstract. The article deals with the problem of inauthentic speech aggression as one of the forms of accepted verbal behaviour in computer-mediated communication. Inauthentic speech aggression refers to a type of antagonistic verbal behaviour, which, however, does not offend the addressee. Analysing discussion topics from the German-language imageboard kohlchan.net , the author identifies the communicative strategies that are used by the communicants to express the sense of solidarity, which is achieved through the expression of negative attitude towards a phenomenon or a person.
Key words and phrases:
речевая агрессия
неаутентичная речевая агрессия
речевое поведение
коммуникативные стратегии
компьютерно-опосредованная коммуникация
speech aggression
inauthentic speech aggression
verbal behaviour
communicative strategies
computer-mediated communication
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Быкова О. Н. Речевая (языковая, вербальная) агрессия: материалы к энциклопедическому словарю «Культура русской речи» // Теоретические и прикладные аспекты речевого общения: научно-методический бюллетень. Красноярск: Изд-во КрасГУ, 1999. Вып. 1 (8). С. 91-103.
  2. Воронцова Т. А. Речевая агрессия: коммуникативно-дискурсивный подход: дисс.. д. филол. н. Челябинск, 2006. 296 с.
  3. Abrahams R. Playing the Dozens // Journal of American Folklore. Chicago: University of Illinois, 1962. Vol. 75. № 297. P. 18-209.
  4. Bernal M. Do Insults Always Insult? Genuine Impoliteness versus Non-genuine Impoliteness in Colloquial Spanish // Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2008. P. 775-802.
  5. Culpeper J. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness // Journal of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996. Vol. 25. № 3. P. 349-367.
  6. https://kohlchan.net (дата обращения: 16.11.2018).
  7. https://krautchan.net (дата обращения: 28.02.2018).
  8. https://www.alexa.com/ (дата обращения: 16.11.2018).
  9. Jucker A. H., Taavitsainen I. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming // Journal of Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 67-95.
  10. Labov W. Rules for Ritual Insults // Sociolinguistics: A Reader. L.: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. P. 472-486.
  11. Leech G. Principles of Pragmatics. L.: Longman, 1983. 250 p.
  12. Sayers W. Serial defamation in two medieval tales: Icelandic Ölkofra þáttr and Irish Scéla mucce Meic Dathó // Oral Tradition 6. Bloomington: Slavica Publishers, 1991. P. 35-57.
  13. Stenström A. B., Jörgensen A. M. A matter of politeness? A contrastive study of phatic talk in teenage conversation // Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2008. Vol. 18. № 4. P. 635-657.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing