|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
|
|
“FOOD-LOVE” METAPHOR IN SHAKESPEARE’S “SONNETS”
|
Valeriya Sergeevna Florova
Moscow State University of Education
|
|
Submitted:
January 10, 2019
|
|
Abstract.
The article is devoted to the issue of the development of the “food-love” metaphor in Elizabethan sonnetists’ and Shakespeare’s works. The metaphor origin is traced in folk culture and Anacreontic poetry, and its transformation in sonnet cycles by Ph. Sidney, G. Constable, E. Spencer, R. Barnfield and W. Shakespeare is also considered. It has been ascertained that the development of the metaphor in Anacreontic nature, refined and playful, is peculiar to the Elizabethan sonnet tradition, while Shakespeare’s understanding is closer to common people and even partly Rabelaisian. This indicates that Shakespeare’s “Sonnets” deviate significantly from the traditional Elizabethan concepts.
|
Key words and phrases:
Шекспир
сонет
сонетный цикл
Сидни
Спенсер
Барнфилд
Констебл
метафора «еды-любви»
Shakespeare
sonnet
sonnet cycle
Sydney
Spencer
Barnfield
Constable
“food-love” metaphor
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Бахтин М. М. Творчество Франсуа Рабле и народная культура Средневековья и Ренессанса. М.: Художественная литература, 1990. 543 с.
- Сидни Ф. Астрофил и Стелла. Защита поэзии. М.: Наука, 1982. 367 с.
- Спенсер Э. Сонеты, песни, гимны о любви и красоте. М.: СПСЛ; Русская панорама, 2011. 440 с.
- Фрейденберг О. М. Поэтика сюжета и жанра. М.: Лабиринт, 1997. 448 с.
- Шекспир У. Полное собрание сочинений: в 10-ти т. М.: Алконост; Лабиринт, 1994. Т. 3. 704 с.
- Шекспир У. Сонеты. М.: Наука, 2016. 884 с.
- Edmondson P., Wells S. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 194 p.
- Kerrigan J. On Shakespeare and early modern literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 266 p.
- Lever J. W. The Elizabethan love sonnet. L., 1966. 282 p.
- Vendler H. The Art of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999. 672 p.
|
|
