Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2019. Volume 12. Issue 5
COLLECTION:    Theory of Language

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

INFERENCE: PRINCIPLE OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM IN NARRATIVE DISCOURSE PERCEPTION

Elena Vladimirovna Suvorova
Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University


Submitted: May 13, 2019
Abstract. Lack of research devoted to the study of the extra-linguistic content of conclusive knowledge in discourse perception has determined the main theme and objectives of the article that is to study the inclusion of such anthropocentric data (factors indirectly affecting text perception and further inference) as space, time, heat/cold, light/shadow, dynamics/statics in inferences that accompany discourse perception. As the results of the study have shown, inference is a dynamic, changeable, ecological cognitive process, which includes not only the processing of the semantic content of the language units of an utterance, but also living knowledge derived from interaction with the environment.
Key words and phrases:
инференция
антропоцентрический принцип
динамика
экология
нарративный дискурс
inference
anthropocentric principle
dynamics
ecology
narrative discourse
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Аристотель. Сочинения: в 4-х т. / ред. и авт. вступ. ст. А. И. Доватур, Ф. Х. Кессиди. М.: Мысль, 1984. Т. 4. 830 с.
  2. Гийом Г. Принципы теоретической лингвистики: сборник неизданных текстов, подготовленный под руководством и с предисловием Рока Валена / пер. с фр. П. А. Скрелина; общ. ред. Л. М. Скрелиной. М.: ЛКИ, 2007. 232 с.
  3. Дейк Т. А. ван, Кинч В. Стратегии понимания связного текста // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. 1988. Вып. XXIII. Когнитивные аспекты языка. С. 153-212.
  4. Залевская А. А. Интерфейсная теория значения слова: психолингвистический подход. Л.: IASHE, 2014. 182 с.
  5. Матурана У., Варела Ф. Древо познания / пер. с англ. Ю. А. Данилова. М.: Прогресс - Традиция, 2001. 224 с.
  6. Суворова Е. В. Виды инференций в дискурсе // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2018. № 4 (82). Ч. 1. С. 176-181.
  7. Ballstaedt S.-P., Mandl H., Schnotz W., Tergan S.-O. Texte verstehen, Texte gestalten. München: Urban und Schwarzenberg, 1981. 211 S.
  8. Carpenter P. A., Just M. A. Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N. J., 1977. 453 р.
  9. Clark H. H., Carlson T. B. Context for Comprehension // Attention and Performance. 1981. Vol. 9. P. 313-330.
  10. Crothers E. J. Paragraph structure inference. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex, 1979. 144 р.
  11. Graesser A., Singer M., Trabasso T. Constructing Inferences during Narrative Text Comprehension // Psychological Review. 1994. Vol. 101. № 3. Р. 371-395.
  12. Grice Paul H. Aspects of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. 135 p.
  13. Henry O. 100 selected stories. L.: Wordsworth Ed., Ltd., 2012. 735 p.
  14. Rickheit G., Strohner H. Inferences in text processing. North Holland - Amsterdam - N. Y. - Oxford: Oxford Press, 1985. 338 р.
  15. Violi P. Meaning and experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001. 291 p.
  16. Vonk W., Noordman L. G. M. The psychology of inferences in discourse // International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Section ‘Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science’ / ed. by N. J. Smelser, P. B. Baltes. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Ltd., 2001. Р. 7427-7435.
All issues


© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishing