Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2020. Volume 13. Issue 5
COLLECTION:    Theory of Language

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

Specificity of Phraseological Unit Semantics: Contextological Approach (by the Example of the Phraseological Unit “Field Day”)

Mariya Igorevna Andreeva
Kazan State Medical University


Submitted: May 29, 2020
Abstract. The article considers the semantic and contextological specificity of the phraseological unit “field day” (mil.) - “opportunity of extraordinary pleasure”. The study is conducted by the material of the American newspaper sub-corpus. The paper aims to identify the phraseological unit additional contextual meanings in different types of discourse. Scientific originality of the research involves the contextual approach to studying the phraseological unit semantics, which allows identifying the contextual factors that determine the situation under description. The findings indicate that the phraseological unit “field day” is often used with the verb “have”. In sports and economic discourses, the phraseological unit “field day” acquires additional meanings: “sports achievements”, “assessment”, “investments”.
Key words and phrases:
корпус
фразеологизм
field day
газетный дискурс
значение
семантика
corpus
phraseological unit
“field day”
newspaper discourse
meaning
semantics
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Амосова Н. Н. Основы английской фразеологии. Изд-е 3-е. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 2013. 180 с.
  2. Кунин А. В. О фразеологической номинации // Фразеологическая семантика: сб. науч. тр. / отв. ред. А. В. Кунин. М., 1983. Вып. 211. С. 88-100.
  3. Новиков Л. А. Сема [Электронный ресурс] // Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. URL: http://tapemark. narod.ru/les/437c.html (дата обращения: 20.03.2020).
  4. Стернин И. А. Семантический анализ слова в контексте. Воронеж: Истоки, 2011. 150 с.
  5. Andreeva M. I., Makarova O. Y., Gorbunova D. V., Lukina M. V. Emotive metaphors in professional jargons // Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2019. Vol. 907. P. 335-342.
  6. Andreeva M. I., Solnyshkina M. I. Idiomatic meaning of idiom ‘Halcyon days’ in institutional discourse: A contextual analysis // Journal of Language and Literature. 2015. Vol. 1. P. 306-310.
  7. Cambridge English Dictionary [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ (дата обращения: 20.03.2020).
  8. Corpus of Contemporary American English [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/ (дата обращения: 20.03.2020).
  9. De-yi H. U. On Meanings through Context Determining and Understanding Word // Journal of Huzhou Vocational and Technological College. 2007. Vol. 1. P. 138-145.
  10. Dobrovol'skij D., Piirainen E. Cultural knowledge and idioms // International Journal of English Studies. 2006. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 25-31.
  11. Dobrovol’skij D., Piirainen E. Idioms: Motivation and etymology // Yearbook of Phraseology. 2010. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 73-96.
  12. Espinal M. T., Mateu J. On classes of idioms and their interpretation // Journal of Pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 42 (5). P. 1397-1411.
  13. Hanks P. The syntagmatics of metaphor and idiom // International Journal of Lexicography. 2004. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 245-274.
  14. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 276 p.
  15. Longman English Dictionary [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.ldoceonline.com/ (дата обращения: 20.03.2020).
  16. McGlone M. S. What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? // Language & Communication. 2007. Vol. 27. № 2. P. 109-126.
  17. Naciscione A. Stylistic use of phraseological units in discourse. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. 309 р.
  18. Oxford Lexico [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.lexico.com/ (дата обращения: 20.03.2020).
  19. Uchida S. Immediate contexts and reported speech // UCL Working Papers in Linguistics. 1997. Vol. 9. № 29. P. 147-159.
All issues


© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishing