Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2021. Volume 14. Issue 12
COLLECTION:    Foreign Literature

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

Two-Worldness in the Novel “Everything Under” by D. Johnson

Ekaterina Rudolfovna Chemezova
Humanities and Education Science Academy (Branch) of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Yalta


Submitted: December 28, 2021
Abstract. The paper aims to identify the principles of world model functioning in the novel “Everything Under” by D. Johnson. The article describes characteristic features of world model in the modern British literature and reveals the specificity of “two-worldness” functioning in the novel “Everything Under” by D. Johnson. Scientific originality of the study lies in the fact that D. Johnson’s novel was not previously subjected to literary analysis and poetological problems associated with world model transformations in the modern British literature have not been previously investigated in the domestic literary criticism. As a result, it is proved that D. Johnson’s novel is based on the principle of transformed mythological (epical) two-worldness. This can be explained by the existence of natural chronotopic borders which the writer tries to overcome and by the specificity of figurative paradigm dynamics.
Key words and phrases:
художественный мир
двоемирие
антимир
Д. Джонсон
современная британская литература
artistic world
two-worldness
anti-world
D. Johnson
modern British literature
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Бахтин М. М. Автор и герой в эстетической деятельности. 2021а. URL: http://www.infoliolib.info/philol/bahtin/5_1.html
  2. Бахтин М. М. Фольклорные основы раблезианского хронотопа. 2021b. URL: http://www.chronos.msu.ru/old/RREPORTS/bakhtin_hronotop/hronotop8.html
  3. Даль В. И. Каноб. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc2p/253250
  4. Джонсон Д. В самой глубине. М.: Эксмо, 2019.
  5. Лепахин В. В. К вопросу о теме «двойничества» в древнерусской литературе и фольклоре. 2021. URL: http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/747/1/dissert_slav_011_012_suppl_059-074.pdf
  6. Лихачев Д. С. Смех как мировоззрение. 2021. URL: http://philologos.narod.ru/smeh/smeh-lihach.htm
  7. Лотман Ю. М. Статьи по семиотике и топологии культуры. 1992. URL: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/cultur/lotman-selection.htm
  8. Тресиддер Дж. Словарь символов. 1999. URL: https://www.booksite.ru/localtxt/tre/sid/der/tresidder_d/slovar_sim/index.htm
  9. Успенский Б. А. Антиповедение в культуре Древней Руси. 1994. URL: http://krotov.info/history/11/uspensky/uspen_01.htm
  10. Чемезова Е. Р. Модели двоемирия в англоязычной литературе // Векторы развития современной англоязычной литературы. Симферополь: ИТ «Ариал», 2019.
  11. Waldman K. Daisy Johnson’s Uncanny Début Novel Rewrites Oedipus. 2018. URL: https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/daisy-johnsons-uncanny-debut-novel-rewrites-oedipus
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing