|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
|
|
Manipulation Involving the Speaker’s Interpersonal Attitudes in the English-Language Judicial Discourse
|
Tatiana Georgievna Konovalenko
Institute of the Service Sector and Entrepreneurship (branch) of DSTU in Shakhty
Kseniia Sergeevna Kashirskaia
ООО EvercodeLab, St. Petersburg
|
|
Submitted:
May 31, 2022
|
|
Abstract.
The paper is devoted to studying the mechanisms of manipulative influence on the addressee in the courtroom and analysing how the use of manipulative tactics in judicial discourse can be conditioned by the speaker’s communicative attitude. The aim of the research is to determine the specificity of the use of manipulative tactics and the speaker’s attitudes in relation to judicial discourse. As a result of studying samples of fragments containing monologues and dialogues from recordings of American court sessions, it has been shown how the interaction between the speaker’s interpersonal attitudes and manipulative tactics used takes place. The paper is the first to propose an analysis of the mechanisms of manipulative influence, to carry out a quantitative estimation of tactics and attitudes, which accounts for scientific novelty of the research.
|
Key words and phrases:
манипулирование
юридический дискурс
межличностные и внеличностные установки
речевые тактики
manipulation
legal discourse
interpersonal and extrapersonal attitudes
speech tactics
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Варнавских Н. В. Типологические черты речевого поведения русско- и англоговорящих адвокатов (прагмалингвистический подход): дисс. … к. филол. н. Ростов н/Д, 2004.
- Дубровская Т. В. Судебный дискурс: речевое поведение судьи: автореф. дисс. … д. филол. н. Саратов, 2010.
- Карасик В. И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград: Перемена, 2002.
- Мережинская З. И. Роль случайного слушающего в ведении английской речевой коммуникации: автореф. дисс. … к. филол. н. СПб., 2007.
- Палашевская И. В. Нарративная организация судебного дискурса // Инициативы XXI века. 2012. № 3.
- Палашевская И. В. Состязательный и персуазивный аспекты судоговорения // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия «Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация». 2011. № 1.
- Dijk T. A. van. Discourse and Manipulation // Discourse & Society. 2006. Vol. 17 (3). DOI: 10.1177/0957926506060250
- Excerpts from the Trial Transcript in the McMartin Preschool Abuse Trial. 1993. URL: https://www.famous-trials.com/mcmartin/909-excerpts
- Gasparyan S. Implementing Manipulative Strategies in Legal Speech // Cognition, Communication, Discourse. 2020. Vol. 20. DOI: 10.26565/2218-2926-2020-20-01
- Harris A. C. Sell! Buy! Semiolinguistic Manipulation in Print Advertising. Northridge, 1989. URL: http://www.csun.edu/~vcspc005/advertis.html
- Harris Z. Discourse Analysis // Language. 1952. Vol. 28. Iss 1.
- Khudhayir S. Manipulation of Meaning in Political Discourse. 2013. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309419661_Manipulation_of_Meaning_in_Political_Discourse
- Maillat D., Oswald S. Defining Manipulative Discourse: The Pragmatics of Cognitive Illusions // International Review of Pragmatics. 2009. Vol. 1 (2).
- Oswald S. It Is Easy to Miss Something You Are not Looking for: A Pragmatic Account of Covert Communicative Influence for (Critical) Discourse Analysis // Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies / ed. by Ch. Hart, P. Cap. L.: Bloomsbury, 2014.
- Picornell I. Analysing Deception in Written Witness Statements // Linguistic Evidence in Security, Law & Intelligence. 2013. Vol. 1 (1). DOI: 10.5195/lesli.2013.2
- Swol L. M. van, Braun M. T., Malhotra D. Evidence for the Pinocchio Effect: Linguistic Differences between Lies, Deception by Omissions, and Truths // Discourse Processes. 2012. Vol. 49. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2011.633331
- The O. J. Simpson Trial: Excerpts from the Trial Transcript. 1995. URL: https://famous-trials.com/simpson/1864-excerpts
- Xu Z., Tian X. Detection of Deceptive Speech Acts in Chinese Courtroom Trials // International Journal of English Linguistics. 2018. Vol. 8 (6). DOI: 10.5539/ijel.v8n6p22
|
|
