Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2024. Volume 17. Issue 5
COLLECTION:    Foreign Literature

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

The linguoconcept of PRIVACY in J. Franzen’s essay “The Imperial Bedroom” (1998)

Yulia Vitalievna Kim
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow


Submitted: May 14, 2024
Abstract. The aim of the research is to propose an interpretation of the linguoconcept PRIVACY through the prism of the works by the American writer J. Franzen, in development of previously expressed interpretations. J. Franzen’s essay “The Imperial Bedroom” (1998) was chosen as the research material. The paper analyzes the changes in the life of the American society against the backdrop of the increasing role of state and corporate technological control in different spheres of an individual’s life; it identifies the link between the thematic originality of J. Franzen’s essay collection “How to Be Alone” and social processes in the USA at the end of the last century; and reveals the originality of the linguoconcept PRIVACY in J. Franzen’s system of values based on the material of the essay “The Imperial Bedroom”. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the presentation of the linguoconcept PRIVACY as interpreted by J. Franzen through the opposition of the states of public space – visibility / PRIVACY – invisibility. As a result, the paper shows that the linguoconcept PRIVACY, previously associated with the state of invisibility, in J. Franzen’s interpretation has incorporated the public space, depriving the individual of the opportunity to be visible in the public space and exposing his vulnerability in private life. The results obtained are extremely important for modern American studies as they open up opportunities for further research on the linguoconcept PRIVACY taking into account current socio-political issues.
Key words and phrases:
Дж. Франзен
лингвоконцепт PRIVACY
публичное пространство
диджитализация
J. Franzen
linguoconcept of PRIVACY
public space
digitalization
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Андреева И. В. Межкультурная коммуникация в русской и американской культурах: аксиологический аспект // Россия и АТР. 2007. № 2.
  2. Афанасьева Е. А. Конфиденциальность онлайн и офлайн // Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 4 «Государство и право». 2018. № 4.
  3. Гаджиев Х. И. Защита частной жизни в цифровую эпоху // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2019. № 6.
  4. Глинская Н. П. Юридический термин ‘privacy’ как предмет системно-динамического исследования // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 19 «Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация». 2010. № 2.
  5. Ким Ю. В. Субъектный нарратив в романе Дж. Франзена «Свобода» (2010) в свете парадигмы постпостмодернизма // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2023. Т. 16. Вып. 6.
  6. Ларина Т. В. ‘Privacy’, или автономия личности, как важнейший концепт английской культуры // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия «Русский и иностранные языки и методика их преподавания». 2003. № 1.
  7. Лысенкова В. Н. Языковая репрезентация концепта PRIVACY (на материале идиоматических выражений английского языка) // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2022. Т. 15. Вып. 12.
  8. Сардар З., Дэвис М. Почему люди ненавидят Америку? М.: Проспект, 2003.
  9. Степанова С. Ю. Художественный текст как источник лингвокультурологической информации в межкультурной коммуникации // Преподаватель XXI век. 2021. № 3-2.
  10. Berman E. Regulating Domestic Intelligence Collection // Washington & Lee Law Review. 2014. Vol. 71 (1).
  11. Best J. S., Krueger S. K., Ladewig J. Trends: Privacy in the Information Age // The Public Opinion Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 70. No. 3.
  12. Bjørio L. V. Freedom from Interference: Decisional Privaсy as a Dimension of Consumer Privacy Online // Academy of Marketing Science Review. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-024-00273-x
  13. Gassar U. Recording Privacy Law: Reflections on the Future Relationship Among Law, Technology, and Privacy // Harvard Law Review Forum. 2016. Vol. 130.
  14. Hafizov A. The Concept of Politeness in English Linguistic Culture // Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences. 2022. Vol. 2. Iss. 12.
  15. Turculeț M. Ethical Issues Concerning Online Social Networks // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 149.
  16. Véliz C. Privacy Is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back Control of Your Data. L.: Bantam Press, 2021.
  17. Véliz C. The Internet and Privacy // Ethics and the Contemporary World / ed. by David Edmonds. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing