Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2026. Volume 19. Issue 1
COLLECTION:    Theory of Language

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

Discourse phrasing of emphatic utterances: the French language

Arkadiy Petrovich Sedykh
Moscow International University; Belgorod National Research University

Elvira Nikolajevna Akimova
Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Moscow

Larisa Alexandrovna Mashkova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Submitted: January 19, 2026
Abstract. The aim of this study is to identify and describe the essential mechanisms for structuring emphatic sentences in French and Francophone discourse within interpersonal rhetorical interactions. In a broader sense, the research’s goal is to identify promising vectors for developing a comprehensive theory of linguacultural proactivity, taking into account the cognitive and communicative data of the national mentality. Achieving this goal requires tracking and documenting the process of emphatic phrasing in discourse to optimally and constructively position the phenomenon of French emotiveness as an object of future research through the prism of historical and modern comparative studies. The scientific novelty of this study lies in updating several aspects of the theme-rhematic approach by enhancing the role of the principle of logicocentricity in the use of thematization and topicalization techniques in the transformation of compositional speech structures. The terminology of discourse studies, as well as the theory of language and communication theory, is also subject to updating and clarification. The key point of this study is the interpretation of the emphatic utterance as a labile and dynamically functioning unit of discourse and narrative of various types, with its own system of semiotic supports and reference points reflecting the emotional and expressive intentions of the speaker. The epistemological model is based on the application of a method for analyzing the semantic density of discourse techniques implemented in the space of emphatic communication. The obtained data opens up additional opportunities for identifying creative mechanisms for the formation of a renewed emphatic narrative, leading to dialogue and constructive synergy between representatives of various sciences and disciplines through the construction and implementation of models of adequate empathic communication associated with the proactive dynamics of synergy between the linguosemiotic and linguacultural parameters of the speech act.
Key words and phrases:
тематизация и топикализация высказывания
эмфатика речи
дискурсная интеракция
теория аргументативной коммуникации
проактивная лингвопрагматика
thematization and topicalization of utterances
emphatics of speech
discourse interaction
theory of argumentative communication
proactive linguopragmatics
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Веденина Л. Г. Французский язык. Структура, функционирование, культура. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2020.
  2. Иосилевич Н. В. Топикализация как одна из форм проявления эго-категории // Историческая и социально-образовательная мысль. 2014. № 4 (26).
  3. Матезиус В. О так называемом актуальном членении предложения // Пражский лингвистический кружок: сборник статей. М.: Прогресс, 1967.
  4. Рикёр П. Память, история, забвение. М.: Изд-во гуманитарной литературы, 2004.
  5. Салтанова Н. Ю. Актуальное членение предложения как средство текстовой организации // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. 2022. Т. 24. № 2. https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-2-231-238
  6. Седых А. П., Акимова Э. Н., Жукова А. Г. Конверс-анализ обыденной речи: русский, французский и английские языки // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2025. Т. 18. Вып. 1. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20250041
  7. Седых А. П., Бузинова Л. М. Коммуникативный имидж французского преподавателя // Вестник Северного (Арктического) федерального университета. Серия: Гуманитарные и социальные науки. 2017. № 4.
  8. Седых А. П., Бузинова Л. М., Пашковская Н. Д. Дискурсология, междисциплинарность, регионализация: монография. Белгород: Эпицентр, 2023.
  9. Aitchison J. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford – Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
  10. Chafe W. Cognitive constraints on information flow // Coherence and Grounding in Discourse / ed. by R. Tomlin. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1987.
  11. Clas A. Langue, langage et les étonnantes locutions, expressions et phrasèmes du français, et leurs correspondants en anglais et en allemand // Meta. 2015. Vol. 60. Iss. 2. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032859ar
  12. Combettes B. Du niveau textuel au niveau énonciatif dans la grammaticalisation: le rôle du contexte // Langue Française. 2006. No. 149.
  13. Combettes B. Facteurs textuels et facteurs sémantiques dans la problématique de l’ordre des mots: le cas des constructions détachées // Langue française. 1996. Vol. 111. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1996.5352
  14. Cruse D. A. Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  15. Firbas J. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  16. Givon T. The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions // Linguistics. 1992. Vol. 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.1.5
  17. Haiman J. Conditionals as topics // Language. 1978. Vol. 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.1978.0009
  18. Halliday M. Notes on transitivity and theme in English // Journal of Linguistics. 1967. No. 3.
  19. Identités sociales et discursives / sous la dir. de P. Charaudeau. P.: Harmattan, 2009.
  20. Jacobson P.Compositional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  21. Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. Le discours en interaction. P.: Dunod, 2005.
  22. Krieg-Planque A. “Formules” et “lieux discursifs”: propositions pour l’analyse du discours politique // Semen. Revue de sémio-linguistique des textes et discours. 2006. Vol. 21.
  23. Lambrecht K. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607
  24. Morin E. La méthode: en 6 vols. P.: Seuil, 2006.
  25. Prince E. Toward a taxomany of given-new information // Radical Pragmatics / ed. by P. Cole. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1981.
  26. Pruvost J. Le Dico des dictionnaires. P.: JC Lattès, 2014.
  27. Rastier F. Sémantique interprétative. P.: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.
  28. Rivarol A. Discours sur l’universalité de la langue française, précédé de la langue humaine par Gérard Dessons, collection “Le Philologue”. P.: Éditions Manucius, 2013.
  29. Schiffrin D. Conditionals as topics in discourse // Linguistics. 1992. Vol. 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.1.165
  30. Schlobinski P., Schütze-Coburn S. On the topic of topic and topic continuity // Linguistics. 1992. Vol. 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.1.89
  31. Siouffi G. Une Histoire de la phrase française. Des “Serments de Strasbourg” aux écritures numériques. Arles: Actes Sud, 2020.
  32. Thuilier J. Contraintes préférentielles et ordre des mots en français. Thèse de l’Université Paris Diderot, 2012.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing