GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and PracticePhilological Sciences. Issues of Theory and PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 9. Part 1. P. 134-137. ISSN 1997-2911.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

PRAGMATIC CATEGORY OF EXPECTATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF FRAME THEORY

Manzheleevskaya Elena Vyacheslavovna
Southern Federal University


Abstract. The category of pragmatic expectations can be considered from the viewpoint of frame theory. Frame-based structuring of individual’s knowledge allows him to predict the possible situations of linguistic and non-linguistic nature. An individual is considered here as a recipient of speech message in a certain situation. In particular, the interaction between a writer and a reader can be interpreted within the framework of esthetic enjoyment when recipient’s pragmatic expectations influence the characteristics of author’s speech.
Key words and phrases: прагматические ожидания, фреймы, прагмалингвистика, отправитель и получатель речевого сообщения, речевое воздействие, фрейм эстетического удовольствия, pragmatic expectations, frames, pragma-linguistics, addresser and recipient of speech message, speech influence, frame of esthetic enjoyment.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Vezhbitska A. Sopostavlenie kul'tur cherez posredstvo leksiki i pragmatiki. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2001. 272 s.
  2. Gerasimov V. I., Petrov V. V. Na puti k kognitivnoi modeli yazyka // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M.: Progress, 1988. Vyp. 23. Kognitivnye aspekty yazyka. S. 5-11.
  3. Deik T. A. van. Kontekst i poznanie. Freimy znanii i ponimanie rechevykh aktov // Deik T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya. M.: Progress, 1989. S. 12-40.
  4. Iriskhanova O. K. O teorii kontseptual'noi integratsii // Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 2001. T. 60. № 3. S. 44-49.
  5. Kamenskaya O. L. Tekst i kommunikatsiya. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1990. 150 s.
  6. Krushevskii N. V. Izbrannye raboty po yazykoznaniyu. M.: Nasledie, 1998. 293 s.
  7. Lindsei P., Norman D. Pererabotka informatsii u cheloveka. M.: Mir, 1974. 550 s.
  8. Manzheleevskaya E. V. Vliyanie pragmaticheskikh ozhidanii otpravitelya na ego rechevoe povedenie (na materiale tekstov russkikh i angliiskikh pisatelei XIX veka): diss. … k. filol. n. Rostov n/D, 2008. 197 s.
  9. Manzheleevskaya E. V. Pragmalingvisticheskaya strategiya stimulirovaniya avtorom chitatel'skoi zainteresovannosti i ee rechevye signaly (na materiale russkoyazychnykh i angloyazychnykh khudozhestvennykh tekstov) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 12 (66). Ch. 2. S. 133-138.
  10. Manzheleevskaya E. V. Rechevaya strategiya optimizatsii ponimaniya soobshchaemogo (na materiale russkoyazychnykh i angloyazychnykh khudozhestvennykh tekstov) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 12 (66). Ch. 3. S. 136-141.
  11. Manzheleevskaya E. V. Rechevoe povedenie pisatelya kak indikator uslovii ego lichnostnoi i tvorcheskoi realizatsii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 10 (64). Ch. 1. S. 115-118.
  12. Manzheleevskaya E. V. Rechevye predpochteniya viktorianskikh pisatel'nits kak pokazatel' ikh pragmaticheskikh ozhidanii (na materiale angloyazychnykh tekstov E. Gaskell, Dzh. Eliot i M. Breddon) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 12 (66). Ch. 1. S. 121-126.
  13. Minskii M. Freimy dlya predstavleniya znanii. M.: Energiya, 1979. 152 s.
  14. Monich Yu. V. Problemy etimologii i semantiki ritualizirovannykh deistvii // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1998. № 1. S. 97-120.
  15. Nedzvetskii V. A. F. M. Dostoevskii kak khudozhnik-messiya. Stat'ya vtoraya. Romanist-geroi-chitatel' // Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 2006. T. 65. № 2. S. 23-32.
  16. Skregg G. Semanticheskie seti kak modeli pamyati // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M.: Raduga, 1983. Vyp. 12. Prikladnaya lingvistika. S. 228-271.
  17. Fillmor Ch. Delo o padezhe otkryvaetsya vnov' // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M.: Progress, 1981. Vyp. 10. Lingvisticheskaya semantika. S. 496-530.
  18. Fillmor Ch. Osnovnye problemy leksicheskoi semantiki // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. 12. Prikladnaya lingvistika. M.: Raduga, 1983. S. 74-122.
  19. Cheif U. L. Pamyat' i verbalizatsiya proshlogo opyta // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. 12. Prikladnaya lingvistika. M.: Raduga, 1983. S. 35-73.
  20. Shenk R. Obrabotka kontseptual'noi informatsii. M.: Energiya, 1980. 360 s.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2020 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru