GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and PracticePhilological Sciences. Issues of Theory and PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 2. Part 2. P. 274-277. ISSN 1997-2911.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-2-2.14

THE GERMAN DISCURSIVE PARTICLES IN THE STRUCTURE OF MODALITY FIELD

Averina Anna Viktorovna, Ivanov Vladimir Dmitrievich
Moscow Region State University


Abstract. The article identifies the place of discursive particles in the structure of functional-semantic field of modality. The authors show that the German discursive particles can transfer epistemic and deontic semantics. It allows referring them to the sphere of modal meanings. The peculiarity of discursive particles lies in the fact that specificity of modal meanings is determined only by contextual surroundings. Discursive particles do not appear in all types of texts and can’t be considered frequent, that’s why they can be referred to as periphery components of functional-semantic field of modality.
Key words and phrases: модальность, дискурсивные частицы, эпистемическая семантика, ударные частицы, функционально-семантическое поле, периферия, modality, discursive particles, epistemic semantics, stressed particles, functional-semantic field, periphery.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Averina A. V. K probleme razgranicheniya modal'nykh i diskursivnykh chastits v nemetskom yazyke // Evraziiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal. 2017. № 2. S. 4-7.
  2. Averina A. V. Epistemicheskaya modal'nost' kak yazykovoi fenomen. M.: URSS, 2012. 192 s.
  3. Bondarko A. V. Printsipy funktsional'noi grammatiki i voprosy aspektologii. Izd-e 2-e, ster. M.: URSS, 2001. 208 s.
  4. Abraham W. Diskurspartikel zwischen Modalit?t, Modus und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich // 40 Jahre Partikelforschung. T?bingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 2010. S. 33-78.
  5. Abraham W. ?ber Unhintergehbarkeiten in der modernen Modalit?tsforschung // Modalit?t und Evidentialit?t. Trier: Focus, 2011. S. 125-147.
  6. Diewald G. Die Modalverben im Deutschen. Grammatikalisierung und Polifunktionalit?t. T?bingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 1999. 464 S.
  7. Fritz Th. Wahr-Sagen: Futur, Modalit?t und Sprecherbezug. Hamburg: Buske, 2000. 229 S.
  8. https://www.linguistik.hu-berlin.de/institut/professuren/korpuslinguistik/korpora (data obrashcheniya: 17.12.2014).
  9. Imo W. Sprache in Interaktion. Analysemethoden und Untersuchungsfelder. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013. 355 S.
  10. Kotin M. Ik gihorta dat seggen.. Modalit?t, Evidentialit?t, Sprachwandel und das Problem der grammatischen Kategorisierung // Modalit?t und Evidentialit?t. Trier: Focus, 2011. S. 35-48.
  11. Leiss E. Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000. 307 S.
  12. Leiss E. Die Verbalkategorien des Deutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1992. 341 S.
  13. Meibauer J. Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung. Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln. T?bingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 1994. 252 S.
  14. www.webcorpora.org (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2017).

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2019 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru