License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF RESEARCH OF THE RUSSIAN POLITICAL PARTIES AS POLITICAL ACTORS. PART II
|
Denis Sergeevich Mart'yanov
Saint Petersburg State University
Maksim Vadimovich Nevzorov
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Aleksei Yur'evich Pryakhin
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
|
Submitted:
February 1, 2015
|
Abstract.
The article considers the methodological aspects of creating a database for the research of the political activity of political parties in Russia. The problem of identifying stable frames finding expression in events that combine the actions of a party with its discourse is solved. The authors reveal the methodological features of research related to the creation of a database on political events, and make the conceptualization of an “event”. A set of project data including the encyclopedia of the Russian parties, the quantitative description of the parties and the event field of the parties is described. Frames in the discourses of new parties are analyzed. The event-analysis of the parties is carried out. The method of political trace-analysis is approved. The basic stable frames of new political parties are identified.
|
Key words and phrases:
актор
методология
дискурс
дискурс-анализ
событие
фрейм
база данных
трейс-анализ
партийная система
политические партии
actor
methodology
discourse
discourse analysis
event
frame
database
trace-analysis
party system
political parties
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Гофман И. Анализ фреймов. Эссе об организации повседневного опыта. М.: Ин-т социологии РАН, 2004. 752 с.
- Мартьянов Д. С., Невзоров М. В. Методологические аспекты исследования российских политических партий как политических акторов. Часть I // Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. Тамбов: Грамота, 2014. № 12 (50). Ч. 3. С. 144-148.
- Остин А. Раннее предупреждение и мониторинг конфликтов // Этнополитический конфликт: пути трансформации. Настольная книга Бергхофского центра. М.: Наука, 2007. С. 132-155.
- Сморгунов Л. В. Событийное политическое знание и его значение для современной сравнительной политологии // Полис. 2011. № 1. С. 122-133.
- Филлипс Л., Йоргенсен М. В. Дискурс-анализ: теория и практика. Харьков: Гуманитарный Центр, 2008. 352 с.
- Azar E. E. The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project // Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1980. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 143-152.
- Benford R. D., Snow D. A. Framing Processes and Social Movements: an Overview and Assessment // Annual Review of Sociology. 2000. Vol. 26. P. 611-639.
- Budge I., Laver M. Policy, Ideology, and Party Distance: Analysis of Election Programmes in 19 Democracies // Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1986. Vol. 11. № 4. P. 607-617.
- Koenig T. Compounding Mixed-Methods Problems in Frame Analysis through Comparative Research // Qualitative Research. 2006. Vol. 6 (1). P. 61-76.
- Koopmans R., Statham P. Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches // Mobilization: the International Journal of Research and Theory about Social Movements, Protest and Collective Behavior. 1999. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 203-221.
- Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed. L. - N. Y.: Verso, 2001. 240 p.
|
|