|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
THE CONTRADICTIONS INHERENT IN THE IDEA OF GENERAL VALIDITY OF REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT
|
Nikita Dmitrievich Bagratuni
Saint-Petersburg State University in Economics
|
|
Submitted:
December 1, 2017
|
|
Abstract.
The article reveals the significance of the liar paradox through the prism of reflective judgment. Ethical and epistemological grounds for a well-known ancient formula are revealed. The abilities to identify and predict are assumed by the methodological framework of reflection, which makes it possible to claim a general validity. So, with the help of the notion of the liar paradox and two forms of common sense, the author states a new rationale for the connection between the Cartesian Cogito and the Kantian judgment ability.
|
Key words and phrases:
здравый смысл
рефлексивное суждение
иллюзия
общезначимость
парадокс лжеца
common sense
reflective judgment
illusion
general validity
liar paradox
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Бергсон А. Здравый смысл и классическое образование // Вопросы философии. 1990. № 1. С. 163-168.
- Витгенштейн Л. Логико-философский трактат // Витгенштейн Л. Философские работы. М.: Гнозис, 1994. Ч. 1. С. 22-165.
- Декарт Р. Рассуждение о методе. М.: Философские технологии, 2014. 335 с.
- Делез Ж. Логика смысла. М.: Раритет, 1998. 480 с.
- Кант И. Критика способности суждения. СПб.: Наука, Ленинградское отделение, 2009. 512 с.
- Мамардашвили М. Встреча с Декартом. М.: Ad Marginem, 1996. 440 с.
|
