|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
|
|
The language of tragedy in the works of S. Goldhill and R. Seaford
|
Anastasiya Sergeevna Drozdenko
Saratov State University
|
|
Submitted:
June 22, 2025
|
|
Abstract.
The aim of this study is to establish the role of the language of ancient tragedy in the context of the socio-political transformations of ancient Greek society, based on the concepts of S. Goldhill and R. Seaford. The work investigates how the linguistic strategies of tragedy (Sophocles' irony, Euripides' rhetoric) and ritual-mythological semantics (R. Seaford's "inverted ritual") shaped the political communication of society. The scientific novelty lies in the comparative analysis of the approaches of Goldhill (linguistic instability as the basis of democratic criticism) and Seaford (transformation of ritual into a narrative of civic responsibility), which reveal the connection between the language of tragedy and the formation of polis identity. It is established that tragedy served as a discursive mechanism for the transition from archaic myth to political conflict, where language became a tool for reflecting on crises of power. As a result of the research, it was found that tragedy is a product of the dialectic between myth and the polis: it processes archaic plots into narratives of civic responsibility (tragedy is an "inverted ritual"); there is a change in format: from Homeric epic "reciprocity" to the conflict of the individual and the collective; the language of tragedy (Sophocles' irony, Euripides' rhetoric) became a prototype of political communication.
|
Key words and phrases:
ирония Софокла
извращенный ритуал
язык трагедии
С. Голдхилл
Р. Сейфорд
Sophocles' irony
inverted ritual
language of tragedy
S. Goldhill
R. Seaford
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Баженов М. В. Стыд как демаркация видимого и невидимого: античность и средние века // Аналитика культурологи. 2008. № 1 (10).
- Вернан Ж.-П. Происхождение древнегреческой мысли. М.: Прогресс, 1988.
- Иванов В. Дионис и прадионисийство. СПб., 2000.
- Кулишова О. В. Хор в древнегреческой драме: социально-политический контекст // Мнемон. Исследования в публикации по истории античного мира. СПб., 2014. Вып. 14.
- Надь Г. Греческая мифология и поэтика. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2002.
- Ярхо В. Н. Семь дней в афинском театре Диониса. М.: Лабиринт, 2004.
- Arnott P. D. Public and Performance in the Greek Theatre. L. - N. Y.: Routledge, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203129401
- Goldhill S. Sophocles and the Language of Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796274.001.0001
- Hansen M. H. Polis. An Introduction to the Ancient Greek City-State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199208494.001.0001
- Seaford R. Reciprocity and Ritual: Homer and Tragedy in the Developing City-State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198149491.001.0001
- Vernant J.-P., Vidal-Naquet P. Mythe et tragédie en Grèce ancienne: en 2 vol. P.: Librairie François Maspero, 1972. Vol. I.
|
|
