Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2013. Issue 12-1
COLLECTION:    Varia

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

LINGUISTIC PARAMETERS SPECIFICITY OF MEDIATION DISCOURSE

Alina Gennad’evna Chernyshenko
Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University


Submitted: November 12, 2013
Abstract. The article presents the characteristics of the main linguistic mediation discourse parameters and their functioning features in the related discourse models of the alternative regulation conflicts sphere. The mediation discourse construction specificity is determined by such parameters as subjectivity and term logicality which define the communicative strategies choice used by the process participants, lexical material, construction schemes of meditative speeches etc. The intertextuality connects the mediation discourse with the legal discourses and also determines its introduction into the other discourse systems (psychological), vocabulary exchange, speech cliché etc. The analysis of the linguistic part of the mediation discourse will make a contribution to the more effective strategies creation in the sphere of conflicts alternative solution which began to develop in Russia.
Key words and phrases:
дискурс медиации
терминологичность
субъектность
интертекстуальность
дискурсивные формации
mediation discourse
term logicality
subjectivity
intertextuality
discourse formations
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Архив медиационных документов «Collection of mediation documents by a mediator Damon Meeks» [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.meekslawfirmllc.com/Mediation_Documents.html (дата обращения: 29.06.2013).
  2. Архив стенографических текстов «Mediation and Mitigated Speech: Approaches and Simulations» [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.courts.state.hi.us/docs/CADR/CADR_LaBelle_MitigatedSpeech2.pdf (дата обращения: 24.06.2013).
  3. Архив стенографических текстов «Mediator’s Speech» [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://adrr.com/adr3/long.htm (дата обращения: 10.09.2013).
  4. Архив стенографических текстов «Mock Trial Handbook» [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.markville.ss.yrdsb.edu.on.ca/history/history/MockTrialHandbook.html (дата обращения: 10.09.2013).
  5. Кожемякин Е. А. Дискурсная компетентность [Электронный ресурс] // Дискурсология: электронная энциклопедия. URL: http://u6935.netangels.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=135%3Adiscursologia-proyecto-enciclopedico&catid=134%3Adiscursologia-proyecto-enciclopedico-&Itemid=55 (дата обращения: 24.06.2013).
  6. Макаров М. Л. Основы теории дискурса. М., 2003. 276 с.
  7. Универсальный англо-русский словарь [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://universal_en_ru.academic.ru/2377882/terminologization (дата обращения: 25.06.2013).
  8. Фуко М. Воля к истине. М.: Касталь, 1996. 448 с.
  9. Baum A. Discourse Participants [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.annabaum.com/r2.pdf (дата обращения: 10.09.2013).
  10. European Code of Conduct for Mediators [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/adr/adr_ec_code_conduct_en.pdf (дата обращения: 10.09.2013).
  11. Geluykens R. From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction. John Benjamins Publishing, 1992. 180 p.
  12. Warshauer M. Mediation of a Medical Negligence Case from the Plaintiff’s Perspective. Warlawgroup, 2008. 77 p.
All issues


© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishing