Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. 2017. Issue 3-1
COLLECTION:    Linguistics

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

THE NOTION OF DISCREPANCIES KNOT LENGTH IN MANUSCRIPTS CLASSIFICATION

Dina Markovna Mironova
Saint Petersburg University
Submitted: March 1, 2017
Abstract. The article formulates the principles of discrepancies knots formation in preparing material for the classification of manuscripts. The author summarizes the rules of singling out discrepancies knots previously proposed by textual critics and applies them to the text of the Church Slavonic translation of the Gospel of Matthew of the XI-XVI centuries. The applicability of the rules is substantiated by the method of Alekseev cluster analysis. This study allows formulating a definition of discrepancies knot length as a minimum element of the text, the change of which is not followed by the change in other elements.
Key words and phrases:
длина узла разночтений
классификация рукописей
кластеризация
коэффициент близости
матрица процентов сходства
метод кластерного анализа Алексеева
узел разночтений
discrepancies knot length
classification of manuscripts
clustering
closeness value
percent similarity matrix
cluster analysis method by Alekseev
discrepancies knot
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Алексеев А. А. Текстология славянской Библии. СПб.: Дмитрий Буланин, 1999. 256 с.
  2. Алексеев А. А., Кузнецова Е. Л. ЭВМ и проблемы текстологии древнеславянских текстов // Лингвистические задачи и обработка данных на ЭВМ. М., 1987. С. 111-121.
  3. Пичхадзе А. А. Применение статистики при текстологическом исследовании памятника с контролируемой традицией (Древнеславянский Паримейник) // Лингвистические задачи и обработка данных на ЭВМ. М.: ИРЯ АН СССР, 1987. С. 121-140.
  4. Colwell E. C. Studies in Textual Criticism of the New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 1969. 319 p.
  5. Epp E. J., Fee G. D. Studies in the Theory and Method of New Testament textual Criticism. Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1993. 430 p.
  6. Salemans B. Building Stemmas with the Computer in a Cladistic, Neo-Lachamnian Way. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press, 2000. 352 p.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing