|
Abstract.
This research aims to determine the main directions in the development of editorial and publishing practices in the Russian academic environment and to trace the changing role of the editor in the scientific communication system over a significant historical period – from the 18th century to the first quarter of the 21st century. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the identification and scientific description of stable models of transformation of the editorial function in domestic scientific discourse, previously not represented in linguistic research. It is shown for the first time that the function of the scientific editor has undergone systemic changes related not only to technological development and digitalization, but also to changes in conceptual frameworks. It is established that in the context of the integration of artificial intelligence, editorial activity acquires new semiotic and ethical parameters, and the editor plays the role of a mediator between the author, the text, and the academic community. The article briefly characterizes the current trends that determine changes in editorial activity, including the influence of historical transformations in society, technological progress, scientometrics, and digitalization. Particular attention is paid to the challenges associated with scientific misconduct and the limitations of digital platforms. The results obtained showed that despite the widespread introduction of automated systems, as well as artificial intelligence, in publishing in general, and in editorial activities related to academic publications, in particular, the participation of a qualified editor remains a necessary condition for compliance with publication ethics, ensuring scientific reliability, logical structure, and linguistic accuracy of texts.
|
References:
- Кириллова О. «Мы уже научились работать самостоятельно» // Университетская книга. 2023. Ноябрь. https://www.unkniga.ru/face/15838-olga-kirillova-my-uzhe-nauchilis-rabotat-samostoyatelno.html
- Куликова Е. Ю. Краденая наука: почему плагиат и самоплагиат неприемлемы // Вестник Российского государственного медицинского университета. 2016. № 6.
- Ломоносов М. В. Dissertation sur les devoirs des journalistes dans l’exposé qu’ils donnent des ouvrages, destinés a maintenir la liberté de philosopher = Рассуждение об обязанностях журналистов при изложении ими сочинений, предназначенных для поддержания свободы философии // Ломоносов М. В. Полное собрание сочинений: в 11 т. М. – Л.: Наука, 1952а. Т. 3.
- Ломоносов М. В. Российская грамматика // Ломоносов М. В. Полное собрание сочинений: в 11 т. М. – Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1952b. Т. 7.
- Оленглоу А.-М. Роль редактора в соблюдении этики научных публикаций // Научная периодика: проблемы и решения. 2012. № 6 (12).
- Baron R. AI editing: are we there yet? // Science Editor. 2024. Vol. 47. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.36591/SE-4703-18
- Jackson J., Landis G., Baskin P. K., Hadsell K. A., English M. CSE guidance on machine learning and artificial intelligence tools // Science Editor. 2023. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. https://doi.org/10.36591/SE-D-4602-07
- Kolodkin-Gal D. Artificial intelligence and the future of image integrity in scientific publishing // Science Editor. 2024. Vol. 47. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.36591/SE-4701-02
- Okereafor B. AI and the future of scholarly publishing (part 1) // The Royal Society. 2023. 28 September. https://royalsociety.org/blog/2023/09/ai-and-the-future-of-scholarly-publishing-1/
- Sebastian F., Baron R. Artificial intelligence: what the future holds for multilingual authors and editing professionals // Science Editor. 2024. Vol. 47. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.36591/SE-D-4702-01
|
