|
License Agreement on scientific materials use.
|
|
|
Speech acts with future tense forms in French and Tatar languages
|
Gulnara Firdavisovna Lutfullina
Kazan State Power Engineering University
Rifat Firdinatovich Mirkhayev
Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Kazan
|
|
Submitted:
December 18, 2025
|
|
Abstract.
The aim of the study is to identify the main speech acts in which future tense forms function in French and Tatar languages. The article reveals the pragmatic potential of future tense forms. It is shown that in both languages, future tense forms are actively involved in the realization of speech acts. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that, for the first time, speech acts in which future tense grammatical forms typically function have been identified, and their characteristics in Tatar and French have been determined. As a result of the study, five most typical speech acts were identified: promise, prediction, command, threat, and prospective praise. In Tatar, the definite future form dominates in the realization of speech acts of promise and threat; this form also prevails in expressing prediction and command, while in the act of praise, they are equally represented. In French, the simple future predominates in the realization of speech acts of promise, prediction, and threat; in the speech act of command, the immediate future is more involved, while in the act of praise, they are equally represented. In French, negative future tense forms are more frequently used, whereas in Tatar, they are observed only when expressing an act of threat. In Tatar, future tense forms are more actively involved in the realization of speech acts of prediction, threat, and promise than in French.
|
Key words and phrases:
речевой акт
будущее время
французский язык
татарский язык
речевой акт приказа
speech act
future tense
French language
Tatar language
speech act of command
|
|
Open
the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
|
|
References:
- Ахатов Г. Х. Татар диалектологиясе (дәреслек). Казан: Татарстан китап нәшрияты, 2003.
- Миннуллин Б. К. Особенности функционирования формы настоящего времени на -а (-а формалы хәзерге заман) в текстах газеты «Кояш» // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2021. Т. 14. Вып. 1. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil201006
- Сафиуллина Ф. С., Зиннатуллина К. З., Сафиуллина А. Г. Хәзерге татар әдәби теле. Казан: Мәгариф, 2010.
- Татар грамматикасы: в 3 т. / под ред. М. З. Закиева. Казан: Татарстан китап нәшрияты, 2008. Т. 3. Синтаксис.
- Юсупов Ф. Ю. Морфология татарского диалектного языка. Категории глагола. Казань: Фэн, 2004.
- Barceló G. J. Modalité et monosémie: les cas des futurs et du présent prospectif en français // De la langue au discours: l’un et le multiple dans les outils grammaticaux / éd. G. J. Barceló, A. Lauze, A. Patard. Montpellier: Service des publications de l’université Paul-Valéry, 2006а.
- Barceló G. J. Le futur des langues romanes et la modalité: monosémie et dialogisme // Cahiers de praxématique. 2006b. № 47. https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.2832
- Barceló G. J. Le (s) futur (s) dans les langues romanes: évolution linéaire ou cyclique? // Cahiers Chronos (à paraître). 2007. Vol. 16.
- Barceló G. J., Bres J. Les temps de l’indicatif. P., 2006.
- Inkster H. The periphrastic future and conditional; present for future // Social variation and the Latin language / ed. by J. N. Adams. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2013.
- Oppermann-Marsaux E., Parussa G. Quelques valeurs énonciatives du futur I en ancien et moyen français // Linx. 2018. № 77. https://doi.org/10.4000/linx.2758
- Rocci A. L’interprétation épistémique du futur en italien et en français: une analyse procédurale // Cahiers de Linguistique française. 2000. № 22.
- Rosier L., Wilmet M. La ‘concordance des temps’ revisitée ou de la ‘concordance’ à la ‘convergence’ // Langue française. 2003. № 138.
- Vetters C., Lière A. Au sujet de la périphrase avec le verbe aller // Langue française. 2009. № 153.
|
|
