GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Almanac of Modern Science and Education. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 11. P. 50-52.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

SUBSTANTIATION OF HISTORY WRITING AUTONOMY IN MICHAEL OAKESHOTT’S PHILOSOPHICAL-HISTORICAL CONCEPTION

Demin Il’ya Vyacheslavovich
Samara University


Abstract. The article analyzes interpretation of historical cognition in Michael Oakeshott’s conception. The issue on correlation of historical and practical ways of the past understanding is thoroughly explored. Novelty of this interpretation of history writing in Oakeshott’s conception is that history is regarded as a special type of experience, not reducible either to practical activity or to aesthetic contemplation. The author identifies some contradictions in interpretation of historical writing suggested by Oakeshott.
Key words and phrases: история, историописание, историческое прошлое, презентизм, исторический опыт, методология истории, Майкл Оукшотт, history, history writing, historical past, presentism, historical experience, methodology of history, Michael Oakeshott
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Ven P. Kak pishut istoriyu. Opyt epistemologii. M.: Nauchnyi mir, 2003. 391 s.
  2. Demin I. V. Osmyslenie istorii kak tselostnosti v gorizonte klassicheskoi i neklassicheskoi filosofii // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2016. № 2. S. 47-90.
  3. Demin I. V. Semioticheskii podkhod k istorii: mezhdu prezentizmom i antikvarizmom // Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. 2015. № 4 (232). S. 48-54.
  4. Demin I. V. Filosofiya istorii v postmetafizicheskom kontekste. Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2015. 251 s.
  5. Zapuskalov A. M. Konservatizm Maikla Oukshotta v sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. № 6 (44). Ch. 2. C. 78-81.
  6. Nikolaev B. V. Teoriya istoricheskogo poznaniya M. Dzh. Oukshotta. Penza: RIO MIEMP, 2010. 232 s.
  7. Oukshot M. Ratsional'nost' v politike i drugie stat'i. M.: Ideya-Press, 2002. 288 s.
  8. Savel'eva I. M., Poletaev A. V. O pol'ze i vrede prezentizma v istoriografii // "Tsep' vremen": problemy istoricheskogo soznaniya. M.: IVI RAN, 2005. S. 63-88.
  9. Oakeshott M. Experience and Its Modes. Cambridge, 1933. 380 p.
  10. White H. The Practical Past // Historein. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 10-19.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru