GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 6. Part 1. P. 122-125.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Sociological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.


Meshcheryakova Nataliya Nikolaevna
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University

Abstract. The article touches upon the peculiarities of social processes behaviour at the stage of modern complex society. The goal is to analyze differences between anomia state in the interpretations of E. Durkheim and R. Merton, which is defined as structural in the work and the anomia of modern complex society, which is suggested being identified as reflexive by the author. It is revealed that the factors provoking social anomia in systemic society are external in respect of the subject itself. Reflexive anomia is caused by internal factors, actors’ subjectivity that becomes significant in the situation of weakening the connections between individuals in society.
Key words and phrases: системное общество, сетевое общество, структурная аномия, рефлексивная аномия, ценности и нормы, systemic society, network society, structural anomia, reflexive anomia, values and norms
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
  1. Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. SPb.: Piter, 2008. 240 s.
  2. Bek U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. 384 s.
  3. Dyurkgeim E. Samoubiistvo: sotsiologicheskii etyud. M.: Mysl', 1994. 399 s.
  4. Kravchenko S. A. Stanovlenie slozhnogo obshchestva: k obosnovaniyu gumanisticheskoi teorii slozhnosti. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2012. 306 s.
  5. Merton R. Sotsial'naya struktura i anomiya // Sotsiologiya prestupnosti (Sovremennye burzhuaznye teorii). M.: Progress, 1966. S. 299-313.
  6. Parsons T. Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv / per. s angl. L. A. Sedova i A. D. Kovaleva; pod red. M. S. Kovalevoi. M.: Aspekt Press, 1998. 270 s.
  7. Titova R. D. Ot krizisa tsennostei k krizisu obshchestvennogo ideala: analiz rossiiskoi real'nosti // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 2 (40): v 2-kh ch. Ch. II. C. 187-189.
  8. Yanitskii O. N. "Turbulentnye vremena" kak problema obshchestva riska // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2011. № 6. S. 155-164.
  9. Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society, the Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Cambridge, MA - Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1996. Vol. I. 556 r.
  10. Djik J. van. The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media. The Netherlands, 1991.
  11. Urry J. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo):