GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. 9. P. 78-84.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philosophical Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

P. FEYERABENDS METHODOLOGICAL PURPOSES AS A MANIFESTATION OF MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POST-NEOCLASSICAL SCIENCE

Kolesova Ol'ga Valentinovna
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod


Abstract. The article examines P. Feyerabends methodological purposes taking into account the mental characteristics of post-neoclassical science. The scientific community ambiguously evaluates P. Feyerabends contribution into the philosophy of science. The author analyzes philosophers methodological approach considering the conceptual, normative and value components. In Feyerabends epistemological anarchism the paper identifies liberalism conceptions, ontological foundations, humanistic values. The study is conducted within the framework of post-modernist discourse which was anticipated and largely developed by Feyerabend.
Key words and phrases: , , , , , , , , , , externalistic element, epistemological anarchism, counter-productive actions, counter-principle, proliferation, incommensurability principle, rationality, forms of existence, mentality, post-neoclassical science.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Gritsanov A. A. Noveishii filosofskii slovar'. Izd-e 2-e, pererab. i dop. Mn.: Interpresservis; Knizhnyi Dom, 2001. 1280 s.
  2. Kolesova O. V. Gnoseologicheskii smysl ponyatiya "mental'nost'" // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. 6 (1). S. 367-373.
  3. Kolesova O. V. Metod I. Lakatosa kak vyrazhenie mental'nykh kharakteristik postneklassicheskoi nauki // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. 8 (58): v 3-kh ch. Ch. 2. S. 103-107.
  4. Kuznetsova N. I. Neopoznannyi Feierabend // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2001. 1. T. 3. S. 210-216.
  5. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii. M.: AST, 2002. 608 c.
  6. Lotman Yu. M. Russkaya kul'tura poslepetrovskoi epokhi i khristianskaya traditsiya [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://palomnic.org/bibl_lit/bibl/lotman/ (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2016).
  7. Mikeshina L. A. Filosofiya poznaniya. Polemicheskie glavy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2002. 624 s.
  8. Narskii I. S. Pol Feierabend i krizis "postpozitivistskoi" metodologii // Feierabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki. M.: Progress, 1986. S. 5-28.
  9. Nauka. Filosofiya. Religiya / In-t filosofii RAN; otv. red.: P. P. Gaidenko, V. N. Katasonov. M.: IFRAN, 2007. Kn. 2. 247 s.
  10. Porus V. N. Ot metodologicheskogo plyuralizma k distsiplinarnomu organizmu: sluchai psikhologii // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2015. 1. S. 5-18.
  11. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa: novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi. M.: Progress, 1986. 432 s.
  12. Reale D., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dnei: v 4-kh t. SPb.: TOO TK "Petropolis", 1997. T. 4. Ot romantizma do nashikh dnei. 880 s.
  13. Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya: slovar' / sost. i otv. red. V. S. Malakhov, V. P. Filatov. M.: TON - Ostozh'e, 1998. 544 s.
  14. Sokal A., Brikmon Zh. Intellektual'nye ulovki. Kritika sovremennoi filosofii postmoderna / per. s angl. A. Kostikovoi i D. Kralechkina. M.: Dom intellektual'noi knigi, 2002. 248 s.
  15. Stepin V. Osnovaniya nauki i ikh sotsiokul'turnaya razmernost' [Elektronnyi resurs] // Nauchnye i vnenauchnye formy myshleniya. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/nau_anti/01.php (data obrashcheniya: 26.07.2016).
  16. Feierabend P. Protiv metoda: ocherk anarkhistskoi teorii poznaniya / per. s ang. A. L. Nikiforova. M.: AST: KhRANITEL', 2007. 413 s.
  17. Feinman R. Kakoe tebe delo do togo, chto dumayut drugie? M. - Izhevsk: RKhD, 2001. 208 s.
  18. Fuko M. Istoriya seksual'nosti-III: zabota o sebe. Kiev - M.: Dukh i litera; Grunt; Refl-buk, 1998. 288 s.
  19. Khorgan Dzh. Konets nauki / per. s angl. M. Zhukovoi. SPb.: Amfora, 2001. 479 s.
  20. Shchedrovitskii G. P. Modeli novykh faktov dlya logiki // Voprosy filosofii. 1968. 4. S. 154-158.
  21. Yung K. G. Protivorechiya Freida i Yunga // Problemy dushi nashego vremeni. M.: Progress; Univers, 1994. S. 61-69.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

2006-2020 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru