Pan-Art Pedagogy. Theory & Practice Philology. Theory & Practice Manuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

ISSUE:    Pedagogy. Theory & Practice. 2020. Volume 5. Issue 6
COLLECTION:    Theory and Methods of Teaching and Upbringing

All issues

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

Teaching English to Law Students by Means of Discourse Analysis on the Basis of C. Hoffman’s Comprehensive Approach

Ekaterina Romanovna Novikova
Derzhavin Tambov State University

Oleg Gennadiyevich Polyakov
Derzhavin Tambov State University

Nadezhda Vasil’yevna Hausmann-Ushkova
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar; Derzhavin Tambov State University


Submitted: December 30, 2020
Abstract. The study aims to prove that there are advantages of using discourse analysis in teaching a professional foreign language to law students. The article examines in great detail a comprehensive approach to teaching the United States legal discourse to foreign students, developed by C. Hoffman and implemented at Georgetown University. The authors propose content of the legal English course for the Russian law students of senior years and describe the steps necessary to organise a class session with discourse analysis involvement. Scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying advantage of using discourse analysis in legal English acquisition. As a result of the research, it is proved that through the use of discourse analysis, students get an opportunity to familiarise with specificities of a foreign legal system and a target language itself in the context of the presented sample of legal discourse.
Key words and phrases:
обучение
английский язык
язык права
юридический дискурс
дискурсивный анализ
teaching
English language
legal language
legal discourse
discourse analysis
Reader Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Гвишиани Н. Б. Язык и дискурс науки. М.: Ленанд, 2019. 314 с.
  2. Карасик В. И. О типах дискурса // Языковая личность: институциональный и персональный дискурс: сб. науч. тр. / под ред. В. И. Карасика, Г. Г. Слышкина. Волгоград: Перемена, 2000. С. 5-20.
  3. Новикова Е. Р. Профессионально-ориентированное обучение английскому языку будущих бакалавров-юристов // Державинский форум. 2019. Т. 3. № 9. С. 54-60.
  4. Скребцова Т. Г. Лингвистика дискурса: структура, семантика, прагматика: курс лекций. М.: ЯСК, 2020. 312 с.
  5. Чернявская В. Е. Лингвистика текста. Лингвистика дискурса: учеб. пособие. М.: Флинта; Наука, 2013. 208 с.
  6. Arthurs H. W. Law and learning in an era of globalization // German Law Journal. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 629-640.
  7. Drolshammer J., Vogt N. P. English as the Language of Law? An essay on the legal lingua franca of a shrinking world. Zürich: Schulthess Juristische Medien, 2003. 100 p.
  8. Fairclough N. Analyzing Discourse. L. - N. Y.: Routledge, 2003. 288 p.
  9. Glenn H. P. Aims of comparative law // Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law / ed. by J. Smits. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006. P. 57-65.
  10. Hoffman C. Using discourse analysis methodology to teach “Legal English” // International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse. 2011. Vol. 1 (2). P. 1-19.
  11. Hoffman C., Tyler A. United States Legal Discourse: Legal English for Foreign LLMs: Coursebook. 1st ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West Academic Publishing, 2006. 74 р.
  12. Salmi-Tolonen T. Negotiated meaning and international commercial law // Language, Culture and the Law: The formulation of legal concepts across systems and cultures / ed. by V. K. Bhatia, C. N. Candlin, A. P. Evangelisti. Bern: Peter Lang, 2008. P. 117-139.
All issues


© 2006-2025 GRAMOTA Publishing