GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 12. Part 2. P. 72-74.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

GENDER AND COMMUNICATIVE STYLE IN ENGLISH-SPEAKING SOCIETY

Ermakovich Svetlana Petrovna
Baltic Fishing Fleet State Academy


Abstract. The article is devoted to the theory of intergroup relations and social changes that are manifested in the features of verbal behaviour of men and women. Different ways of higher social status achievement by subordinate group members, as well as common stereotypes of masculinity, by which means men are socialized, are considered. Attention is paid to the fact that the cooperative communicative style, typical of women, is more functional in comparison with the competitive style inherent to men.
Key words and phrases: гендер, коммуникативный стиль, стереотип, лингвистический стандарт, маскулинность, фемининность, gender, communicative style, stereotype, linguistic standard, masculinity, femininity
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Kalugina E. N. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy gendernykh issledovanii v lingvistike: sostoyanie i perspektivy // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 7 (25). Ch. I. C. 79-81.
  2. Kirilina A. V. Gender: lingvisticheskie aspekty. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 1999. 180 s.
  3. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 281 p.
  4. Coates J. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. London – N. Y.: Longman, 1993. 228 p.
  5. Deuchar M. A Pragmatic Account of Women’s Use of Standard Speech // Women in Their Speech Communities / J. Coates, D. Cameron (eds.). London: Longman, 1989. P. 27-32.
  6. Holmes J. Women, Men and Politeness. London – N. Y.: Longman, 1995. 254 p.
  7. Levant R. F. Men and Masculinity // Encyclopedia of Women and Gender: Sex Similarities and Differences and the Impact of Society on Gender / J. Worell (ed.). San Diego, California: Academic Press, 2001. Vol. 2. P. 717-727.
  8. Scott J. W. Millennial Fantasies: The Future of "Gender" in the 21st Century [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://kcgs. org.ua/RUSSIAN/text.html (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2013).
  9. Spertus E. Why are There so Few Female Computer Scientists? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://stuff.mit.edu /afs/sipb/user/ghudson/info/csfem.txt (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2013).
  10. Tajfel H. The Social Psychology of Minorities. Minority Rights Group, 1978. 20 p.
  11. Tannen D. That’s Not What I Meant! London: Vigaro Press, 1998. 180 p.
  12. Young S. CT Resources: Judith Butler Essay by Sally Young [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.theory.org.uk/ ctr-b-e1.htm (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2013).

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru