GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. 11. Part 3. P. 213-218.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Philological Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

F. M. DOSTOYEVSKYS PERCEPTION OF THE NOVEL "ANNA KARENINA": SYMBOLIC ASPECT

Sharakov Sergei Leonidovich
F. M. Dostoyevsky House-Museum in Staraya Russa


Abstract. In the article the peculiarities of the symbolic world view of F. M. Dostoyevsky and L. N. Tolstoy are identified. The critical reaction of F. M. Dostoevsky to the novel "Anna Karenina" is studied in the work. The author draws attention to the conceptual basis of Dostoevsky's thought, in particular, the Providence, the antithesis of belief and unbelief and the connected with this opposition of spirit and letter. The peculiarities of L. N. Tolstoys world outlook are considered through the concept of general and special Providence. The features of artistic symbolism of the writer are revealed through the notion of artistic symmetry.
Key words and phrases: , , , , , artistic symbolism, artistic symmetry, general and special Providence, spirit and letter, belief and unbelief.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Grigorii Palama, svyatitel'. Triady v zashchitu svyashchennobezmolvstvuyushchikh. SPb.: Nauka, 2007. 429 s.
  2. Dostoevskii F. M. Dnevnik pisatelya za 1873 god // Dostoevskii F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1983. T. 25. S. 5-223.
  3. Dostoevskii F. M. Podrostok // Dostoevskii F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1975. T. 13. 456 s.
  4. Maklakov V. A. Tolstoi kak mirovoe yavlenie (Rech', proiznesennaya v Prage 15 noyabrya 1928 g. na prazdnovanii yubileya L. Tolstogo) // L. N. Tolstoi: pro et contra. Lichnost' i tvorchestvo L'va Tolstogo v otsenke russkikh myslitelei i issledovatelei. SPb.: Izd-vo Russkogo Khristianskogo gumanitarnogo instituta, 2000. S. 684-702.
  5. Maksim Ispovednik, prepodobnyi. O razlichnykh nedoumeniyakh u svyatykh Grigoriya i Dionisiya (Ambigvy). M.: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2006. 464 s.
  6. Papernyi V. M. K voprosu o sisteme filosofii L. N. Tolstogo // L. N. Tolstoi: pro et contra. Lichnost' i tvorchestvo L'va Tolstogo v otsenke russkikh myslitelei i issledovatelei. SPb.: Izd-vo Russkogo Khristianskogo gumanitarnogo instituta, 2000. S. 794-817.
  7. Slivitskaya O. V. "Istina v dvizhen'i": O cheloveke v mire L. Tolstogo. SPb.: Amfora, 2009. 443 s.
  8. Ioann Zlatoust, svyatitel'. Protiv iudeev // Polnoe sobranie tvorenii svyatitelya Ioanna Zlatousta: v 12-ti t. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskaya dukhovnaya akademiya, 1898. T. 1. Kn. 2. S. 645-760.
  9. Tolstoi L. N. Anna Karenina (5-8 chasti) // Tolstoi L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 90-ta t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1935. T. 19. S. 3-400.
  10. Tolstoi L. N. Otvet na opredelenie Sinoda ot 20-22 fevralya i na poluchennye mnoyu po etomu sluchayu pis'ma (1901) // Tolstoi L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 90-ta t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1952. T. 34. S. 245-253.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

2006-2020 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru