GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 6. Part 1. P. 89-92.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.


Lebedeva Ol'ga Vladimirovna
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University

Abstract. Examining the genre peculiarities of the English novel by the example of "The Canterbury Tales" by G. Chaucer, the author of the research focuses her attention on the sources which influenced the writing of this work, particularly pointing out "The Decameron" by G. Boccaccio. An attempt to conduct the comparative analysis of two pairs of novels similar in plot from "The Canterbury Tales" and "The Decameron" is made. The typological differences of novels of the English and Italian revealed during the intratextual analysis authors allow finding out the genre peculiarity of the English novel of the Chaucer period as one of the key stages of the genre development.
Key words and phrases: английская новелла, сравнительно-сопоставительный анализ, жанр, жанровая специфика, историческое развитие, English novel, comparative analysis, genre, genre peculiarity, historical development
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
  1. Anikin G. V., Mikhal'skaya N. P. Istoriya angliiskoi literatury. M., 1998. 516 c.
  2. Bogodarova N. A. Dzheffri Choser: shtrikhi k portretu // Srednie veka. M., 1990. Vyp. 53. C. 213-225.
  3. Bokkachcho Dzh. Dekameron. M., 1970. 704 s.
  4. Dzhivelegov A. K. Choser [Elektronnyi resurs] // Istoriya angliiskoi literatury. T. 1. Vyp. 1. M. - L., 1943. URL (data obrashcheniya: 14.10.2014).
  5. Saprykin Yu. M. O gumanisticheskikh ideyakh Chosera // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Istoriya. 1978. № 1. S. 43-64.
  6. Choser Dzh. Kenterberiiskie rasskazy. M., 2007. 768 s.
  7. Shirokova N. S. Mify kel'tskikh narodov. M., 2005. 432 s.
  8. Coulton G. Chaucer and his England. L., 2004. 321p.
  9. Edwards R. Chaucer and Boccaccio. Antiquity and Modernity. N. Y., 2001. 223 p.
  10. Hutton E. Chaucer and Italy // Nineteenth Century. 1940. CXXVIII. P. 51-59.
  11. Kirkpatrick R. The Wake of the Commedia: Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and Boccaccio’s Decameron // Chaucer and the Italian Trecento. L., 1982. P. 201-230.
  12. Lewis C. S. What Chaucer Really did to II Filostrato // Sritical Essays on Chaucer`s Troilus and Criseyde / D. Benson. 1991. P. 8-22.
  13. Lowell J. R. Chaucer. 1870 // Chaucer G. A Critical Anthology. Baltimore, 1969. 328 p.
  14. Neuschafer H. J. Boccacio und Beginn der Novellistik. Munchen, 1969.
  15. Pratt R., Young K. The Literary Framework of the Canterbury Tales // Sources and Analogues of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Chicago, 1941. P. 1-32
  16. Ruggiers P. The Art of the Canterbury Tales. Madison, 1965. 253 p.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo):