GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. 7. Part 1. P. 166-169.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Pedagogical Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

THE NOVEL BY F. M. DOSTOYEVSKY "THE IDIOT": EASTERN SUBTEXT AND CREATIVE WRITING

Bekmetov Rinat Ferganovich
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University


Abstract. The article is devoted to the problem of interpreting the novel by F. M. Dostoyevsky "The Idiot" at higher and secondary school. The study aims to present the writers creative work in broad philosophical and esthetic context. Modern literary education requires multi-dimensional understanding of classical works. Such an approach, on the one hand, implements the tendency to awake a new readers interest, to focus his/her attention on the heritage of the past. On the other hand, multi-dimensionality realizes an internal semantic potential associated with any great artistic phenomenon and discovers it contextually "in the big time" (M. M. Bakhtin). Dostoyevskys "The Idiot" can be interpreted not only in terms of western or traditionally Russian worldview but also in the eastern spiritual aspect. The figure of the main personage, prince Myshkin, serves as a linking element. The consideration of eastern subtext allows deeper understanding the meaning of his words and actions.
Key words and phrases: . . , "", , , , F. M. Dostoyevsky, "The Idiot", interpretation, eastern subtext, creative writing.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Alekseev P. V. Musul'manskii kod "Khozhdeniya za tri morya" Afanasiya Nikitina // Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2009. 3 (15). S. 70-74.
  2. Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1972. 470 s.
  3. Bekmetov R. F. Eshche raz o "simvole very" F. M. Dostoevskogo (k vostochnomu kontekstu mirovozzrencheskoi formuly) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. 7 (37). Ch. I. C. 30-34.
  4. Borisova V. V. Sintetizm religiozno-mifologicheskogo podteksta v tvorchestve F. M. Dostoevskogo (Bibliya i Koran) // Tvorchestvo F. M. Dostoevskogo (iskusstvo sinteza): sb. st. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1991. S. 63-89.
  5. Dostoevskii F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem: v 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1973. T. VI. Prestuplenie i nakazanie. 421 s.
  6. Dostoevskii F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem: v 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1973. T. VIII. Idiot. 510 s.
  7. Koran / per. s arab. M.-N. O. Osmanova. SPb.: Dilya, 2009. 576 s.
  8. Krasnova G. Dostoevskii i Koran // Voprosy literatury. 1998. Mai-Iyun'. S. 328-334.
  9. Nazirov R. G. Tvorcheskie printsipy F. M. Dostoevskogo. Saratov: Izd-vo SGU, 1982. 160 s.
  10. Skaftymov A. P. Nravstvennye iskaniya russkikh pisatelei. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1972. 543 s.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

2006-2020 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru