GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 9. Part 1. P. 84-87.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.


Dolmatova Olesya Vladimirovna
Pyatigorsk State University

Abstract. In the article a special case of definiteness effect - the quantifier "all" in post-verbal nominal groups of English existential sentences is studied. Participation of the quantifier in this position is traditionally considered doubtful, however, corpus material counters this opinion. During the study of the conditions of this structure functioning it was ascertained that for access to the post-copular nominal group and for combination with semantics of existentiality, universality of the quantifier should be removed or restricted by determinatives-companions.
Key words and phrases: детерминативы, квантификаторы, эффект определенности, квантор универсальности, экзистенциальные предложения, determinatives, quantifiers, definiteness effect, universal quantifier, existential sentences
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
  1. Barwise J., Cooper R. Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language // Linguistics and Philosophy. 1981. № 4. P. 159-219.
  2. Bentley D. Definiteness Effects: Evidence from Sardinian [Elektronnyi resurs] // Transactions of the Philological Society. 2004. № 102.1. P. 57-101. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2016).
  3. Bowdle B., Ward G. Generic Demonstratives // Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkely: Berkely Linguistics Society, 1995. P. 32-43.
  4. Brems L., Davidse K. The Reanalysis and Grammaticalisation of Nominal Constructions with Kind/Sort of: Chronology and Paths of Change [Elektronnyi resurs] // A Survey on Corpus-Based Research. AELINCO. 2009 P. 414-430. URL: NOMINAL_CONSTRUCTIONS_WITH_KINDSORT_OF_CHRONOLOGY_AND_PATHS_OF_CHANGE (data obrashcheniya: 26.06.2016).
  5. Carlson G. Truth-Conditions of Generic Sentences: Two Contrasting Views // The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. P. 224-237.
  6. Chang C., Mikkelsen L. On Existentials, Locatives, and the Definiteness Effect in Korean [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 20.05 2016).
  7. Davies M. Corpus of Contemporary American English [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 25.06.2016).
  8. Denison D. History of the Sort of Construction Family [Elektronnyi resurs]: paper presented at the Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, University of Helsinki, 7 September 2002. URL: http://www.humanities. (data obrashcheniya: 26.06.2016).
  9. Denison D. The Grammaticalisations of Sort of, Kind of and Type of in English [Elektronnyi resurs]: paper presented at the NRG3 Santiago, 19 July 2005. URL: NRG3_paper.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 23.06.2016).
  10. Francez I. Existential Propositions [Elektronnyi resurs]: Ph. D. dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2007. 151 p. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2016).
  11. Keenan E. L. The Definiteness Effect: Semantics or Pragmatics? // Natural Language Semantics. 2003. № 11. P. 187-216.
  12. Lumsden M. Existential Sentences. Their Structure and Meaning. London: Routledge, 2014. 269 p.
  13. McNally L. A Semantics for the English Existential Construction [Elektronnyi resurs]: Ph. D. dissertation. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California / reprinted. N. Y.: Garland, 1997. 237 p. URL: McNally1997.pdf/5f057724-1a18-451f-858c-68d7e5832586 (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2016).
  14. McNally L. Existential Sentences Cross-Linguistically: Variations in Form and Meaning [Elektronnyi resurs] // Annual Review of Linguistics. 2016. № 2. P. 211-231. URL: Sentences_Cross-Linguistically_Variations_in_Form_and_Meaning (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2016).
  15. McNally L. Existential Sentences without Existential Quantification [Elektronnyi resurs] // Linguistics and Philosophy 1998. № 21. P. 353-392. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 18.05.2016).
  16. Mikkelsen L. Reanalyzing the Definiteness Effect: Evidence from Danish [Elektronnyi resurs] // Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. 2002. № 69. P. 1-75. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2016).
  17. Milsark G. Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English // Linguistic Analysis. 1977. № 3. P. 1-30.
  18. Norris M. Extraposition and Definiteness Effects in Icelandic DPs [Elektronnyi resurs]. UC Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, 2011. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2016).
  19. Paducheva E. Definiteness Effect: The Case of Russian [Elektronnyi resurs] // Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 2003. P. 133-146. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 22.03.2016).
  20. Peredy M. Obligatory Adjuncts Licensing Definiteness Effect Constructions // Adverbs and Adverbial Adjuncts at the Interfaces. Berlin - N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. P. 197-229.
  21. Rodriguez-Mondonedo M. A Restriction on the Definiteness Effect in Spanish [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 22.05.2016).
  22. Villalba X. Definiteness Effect, Pronouns and Information Structure in Catalan Existentials [Elektronnyi resurs] // Definiteness Effects: Bilingual, Typological and Diachronic Variation. Cambridge University Press, 2015. URL: existentials (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2016).

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo):