Intensity of Speech Influence in Socio-Political Debates from the Viewpoint of Argumentative-Strategic Approach (by the Material of the Russian-Language and English-Language Debates)
Kulabukhov Nikita Vladimirovich
Kaluga State University named after K. E. Tsiolkovsky
Submitted: 06.02.2020
Abstract. The article examines the means to express intensity as a speech influence characteristic that manifests itself in statements of the politicians participating in the Russian-language and English-language socio-political debates. Speech influence in socio-political debates is for the first time analysed through the lenses of the category of intensity, in the aspect of tactical and strategic arrangement of linguistic units and in the aspect of the theory of argumentation. The conclusions are made that the components of socio-political debates as a special speech influence genre possess certain characteristics that emphasize the discourse agent’s speech influence and are directly associated with the category of intensity.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Vasil'ev L. G. Lingvisticheskie aspekty ponimaniya: diss. … d. filol. n. Kaluga: Kaluzhskii gos. ped. un-t, 1999. 251 s.
Vasil'ev L. G., Nazarchuk Yu. I. Lingvisticheskaya argumentologiya: strukturno-semanticheskii podkhod: monografiya. Kaluga - Tiraspol': Kaluzhsk. gos. un-t im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo; Pridnestrovsk. gos. un-t im. T. G. Shevchenko, 2013. 131 s.
Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoi rechi. Izd-e 5-e. M.: LKI, 2008. 288 s.
Kulabukhov N. V. Intensivnost' rechevogo vozdeistviya v sotsial'no-politicheskikh debatakh: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Tver', 2018. 20 s.
Puchkova E. V. Argumentativno-lingvisticheskii analiz diskursa oproverzheniya: diss. … k. filol. n. Kaluga, 2006. 203 s.
Rodionova S. E. Semantika intensivnosti i ee vyrazhenie v sovremennom russkom yazyke // Problemy funktsional'noi grammatiki. Polevye struktury / pod red. A. V. Bondarko. SPb.: Nauka, 2005. S. 150-166.
Sternin I. A. Osnovy rechevogo vozdeistviya. Voronezh: Istoki, 2012. 178 s.
Tretii raund debatov kandidatov na post mera Moskvy (polnaya versiya) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.m24.ru/articles/23724 (data obrashcheniya: 02.03.2020).
Turanskii I. I. Sredstva intensifikatsii vyskazyvaniya v angliiskom yazyke: uchebnoe posobie k spetskursu dlya studentov pedagogicheskikh institutov i fakul'tetov inostrannykh yazykov. Kuibyshev: Kuibyshevskii gos. ped. in-t, 1987. 78 s.
Shapochkin D. V. Politicheskii diskurs: kognitivnyi aspekt: monografiya. Tyumen': Izd-vo Tyumenskogo gos. un-ta, 2012. 260 s.
Crable R. E. Argumentation as Communication: Reasoning with Receivers. Columbus (Ohio): A. Bell and Howell Company, 1976. 276 p.
Toulmin S. The Uses of Argument. L. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958. 415 p.
Transcript of BBC 1, Opposition Parties Election Debate [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://news-watch.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Transcript-of-BBC1-Opposition-Parties-Election-Debate.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.03.2020).
Русский
