GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2011. № 3. Part 1. P. 195-197.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Law Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

CIRCUMSTANCES MITIGATING AND AGGRAVATING PUNISHMENT AND THEIR ROLE IN PUNISHMENT INFLICTION IN CASE OF JURYMEN'S VERDICT FOR MERCY

Shaikhutdinova Aigul' Salimovna
Kazan' (Privolzh'e) Federal University (Kazan'State University named after V. I. Ul'yanov-Lenin)


Abstract. The article reveals the content of circumstances mitigating and aggravating punishment and their role in inflicting fair punishment in case of jurymen's verdict for mercy.
Key words and phrases: обстоятельства, смягчающие наказание, обстоятельства, отягчающие наказание, вина, индивидуализация уголовной ответственности, вердикт присяжных заседателей о снисхождении, circumstances mitigating punishment, circumstances aggravating punishment, guilt, criminal liability individualization, jurymen's verdict for mercy.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Bazhanov M. I. Smyagchayushchie i otyagchayushchie otvetstvennost' obstoyatel'stva pri naznachenii nakazaniya // Voprosy gosudarstva i prava. M., 1974. S. 246-259.
  2. Gaskin S. S. Otyagchayushchie obstoyatel'stva i ikh znachenie dlya individualizatsii ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya: avtoref. … diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1981.
  3. Zhidkikh I. V. Realizatsiya printsipov ugolovnogo prava v obshchikh nachalakh naznacheniya nakazaniya: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2007.
  4. Karpets I. I. Otyagchayushchie i smyagchayushchie obstoyatel'stva v ugolovnom prave. M., 1959. 119 s.
  5. Kruglikov L. L. Smyagchayushchie i otyagchayushchie obstoyatel'stva v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Yaroslavl', 1977. S. 47.
  6. Kruglikov L. L. Smyagchayushchie i otyagchayushchie obstoyatel'stva v ugolovnom prave. M., 1985. 166 s.
  7. Kuznetsova N. F., Kurinov B. A. Otyagchayushchie i smyagchayushchie obstoyatel'stva, uchityvaemye pri opredelenii mery nakazaniya // Primenenie nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1958. S. 92-150.
  8. Malkov V. P., Volkov B. S. Lichnost' prestupnika i primenenie nakazaniya. Izd-vo KGU, 1980. 150 s.
  9. Myasnikov O. A. Sushchnost' i pravovaya priroda smyagchayushchikh i otyagchayushchikh nakazanie obstoyatel'stv // Pravovedenie. 2003. № 2.
  10. Savenkov A. V. Printsip individualizatsii pri naznachenii nakazaniya: avtoref. … diss. kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2004.
  11. Sundeeva I. N. Uchet otyagchayushchikh obstoyatel'stv pri naznachenii nakazaniya: avtoref. … diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2005.
  12. Shargorodskii M. D. Vina i nakazanie v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. M., 1945.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2021 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru