GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:   Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 5. Part 1. P. 199-202.
SCIENTIFIC AREA: Law Sciences
To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

TOPICAL ISSUES OF INQUEST IN SHORT FORM

Kharzinova Violeta Mukhamedinovna
North-Caucasian Advanced Training Institute for the Personnel of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (Branch) of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia


Abstract. The article touches on the following issues: the peculiarities of inquest in short form; the difference of the short form from the general form of inquest; the opinions of practitioners and processualists on the short form of inquest; the problems of proving under the short form of inquest; the specifics of ultimate fact and problems associated with ultimate fact; peculiarities while considering a petition to conduct inquest in short form; the role of the victim while conducting inquest in short form. The author pays special attention to the analysis of criminal procedure norms, the problems of their application and existing lacunas. The paper aims to examine the regulations, which remove the problems of the practical application of the short form of inquest.
Key words and phrases: сокращенная форма дознания, ходатайство подозреваемого, предел доказывания, сроки дознания, согласие потерпевшего, орган дознания, заявление о проведении сокращенной формы дознания, short form of inquest, petition of the suspect, limit of proving, time term of inquest, consent of victim, body of inquiry, petition to conduct short form of inquest.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.

 

References:
  1. Aleksandrov A. S., Safin R. R., Yunusov R. R. K voprosu o sozdanii sokrashchennoi formy dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. 2012. № 4. S. 264-265.
  2. Beloborodova E. Yu. Novinka v Ugolovno-protsessual'nom kodekse. Doznanie v sokrashchennoi forme [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://pravorub.ru/articles/23837.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.01.2014).
  3. Domkin P. A. Doznanie v sokrashchennoi forme [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.advodom.ru/blog/sokrashhennyiy-poryadok-doznaniya (data obrashcheniya: 20.12.2014).
  4. Kanokova L. Yu. Proverka povodov dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela kak obyazatel'nyi etap nachala proizvodstva po delu // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. № 6 (44). S. 89-91.
  5. Poluyaktova N. Sokrashchennomu doznaniyu byt'? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.justicemaker.ru/view-article.php?id=22&art=3653 (data obrashcheniya: 20.12.2014).
  6. Kharzinova V. M. Aktual'nye problemy proizvodstva doznaniya v sokrashchennoi forme. Nal'chik: Poligrafservis, 2014. 70 s.

To Publish Article in the Journal | To show issue content | To show all articles in section | Subject Index

© 2006-2021 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru