A. V. CHAYANOV’S SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL MODEL OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT
Zhuravleva Lyudmila Anatol'evna, Zarubina Elena Vasil'evna, Simachkova Natal'ya Nikolaevna
Urals State Agrarian University
Submitted: 17.04.2018
Abstract. The subject of the article is the socio-philosophical ideas of the outstanding domestic philosopher, economist, sociologist and agronomist A. V. Chayanov. The authors reveal consistently the urgency of determining the ways of developing domestic agriculture on the basis of the socio-philosophical model proposed by A. V. Chayanov. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the notion of family-labor peasant economy by A. V. Chayanov, which reveals the value bases and cultural specificity of agricultural production in our country: "sense of the owner" inherent in the peasant due to his proximity to the land, close connection with the natural rhythms of life, the traditions of good-neighborliness and mutual assistance, and a number of others.
Key words and phrases: аграрная культура, "моральная экономика", социально-философская модель, развитие сельского хозяйства, ценностные основания крестьянского труда, национальный менталитет, семейно-трудовое крестьянское хозяйство, социальная антропология, agrarian culture, "moral economy", socio-philosophical model, agriculture development, value bases of peasant labor, national mentality, family-labor peasant economy, social anthropology
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Aleksandrova N. A., Vasil'tsova L. I., Voronin B. A., Voronina Ya. V., Donnik I. M., Zhuravleva L. A., Mitin A. N., Mikhalev A. V., Nabokov V. I., Nekrasov K. V., Panchenko A. Yu., Potekhin N. A., Savin V. N., Sarabskii A. A., Skvortsov E. A., Stozhko K. P., Fateeva N. B., Tselishchev N. N. Aktual'nye problemy upravleniya, ekonomiki, kul'tury: monografiya. Ekaterinburg: UrGAU, 2015. 340 s.
Voronin B. A., Voronina Ya. V. Aktual'nye problemy razvitiya fermerstva // Agrarnoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2016. № 2. S. 16-22.
Gosudarstvennaya programma razvitiya sel'skogo khozyaistva i regulirovaniya rynkov sel'skokhozyaistvennoi produktsii, syr'ya i prodovol'stviya na 2013-2020 gody [Elektronnyi resurs]: utverzhdena postanovleniem Pravitel'stva RF ot 14.07.2012 № 717. URL: https://programs.gov.ru/Portal/programs/passport/127 (data obrashcheniya: 16.04.2018).
Donnik I. M., Voronin B. A., Loretts O. G., Fateeva N. B. Gosudarstvennaya agrarnaya politika v sovremennoi Rossii // Agrarnyi vestnik Urala. 2015. № 9 (139). S. 74-80.
Zhuravleva L. A., Kruzhkova T. I., Rushchitskaya O. A. Problemy i trendy razvitiya APK // Agrarnoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2016. № 2. S. 21-25.
Zarubina E. V. Problema formirovaniya obshchenatsional'noi ideologii v sovremennoi Rossii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 11 (73). Ch. 1. S. 51-53.
Medvedev N. V. Filosofsko-metodologicheskie problemy kross-kul'turnoi interpretatsii: monografiya. Tambov: Izd-vo TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2007. 248 s.
Momdzhyan K. Kh. Vvedenie v sotsial'nuyu filosofiyu. M.: Vysshaya shkola; KD "Universitet", 1997. 448 c.
Simachkova N. N., Dombaeva I. V., Zarubina E. V. Gosudarstvennaya kadrovaya politika v Rossii cherez prizmu istoricheskoi retrospektivy // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2018. № 2. S. 178-183.
Titova N. E. Istoriya ekonomicheskikh uchenii: kurs lektsii. M.: Gumanitarnyi izdatel'skii tsentr "VLADOS", 1997. 288 s.
Fadeeva O. P. Sel'skie soobshchestva i khozyaistvennye uklady: ot vyzhivaniya k razvitiyu. Novosibirsk: IEOPP SO RAN, 2015. 264 c.
Chayanov A. V. Krest'yanskoe khozyaistvo. Izbrannye trudy. M.: Ekonomika, 1989. 492 s.
Chayanov A. V. Osnovnye idei i formy organizatsii sel'skokhozyaistvennoi kooperatsii // Chayanov A. V. Izbrannye trudy. M.: Kolos, 1993. S. 247-574.
Chayanov A. V. Puteshestvie moego brata Alekseya v stranu krest'yanskoi utopii [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://az. lib.ru/c/chajanow_a_w/text_0020.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 12.04.2018).
Shanin T. Tri smerti Aleksandra Chayanova // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 1995. № 1. S. 92-109.
Русский
