Goldovskaya Alyona Viktorovna
Tomsk State University
Submitted: 02.08.2021
Abstract. The purpose of the research is to determine the possibilities of applying the approach based on the idea of the rhizome as a productive socio-philosophical foundation for theoretical understanding of disability issues. Scientific novelty lies in substantiating the statement that by considering disability issues from the standpoint of a rhizomatic approach it will be possible to develop promising disability theories that will meet modern needs. As a result, it has been shown that the possibilities of using this approach to study disability issues consist in recognising the heterogeneity and diversity of the studied group, which makes it possible to interpret disability as a manifestation of human diversity and not to reduce it to a generic deviation from the norm.
Key words and phrases: ризома, плюрализм, инвалидность, здоровье, человеческое разнообразие, rhizome, pluralism, disability, health, human diversity
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya / per. s frants. Ya. I. Svirskogo; pod red. V. Yu. Kuznetsov. Ekaterinburg - M.: U-Faktoriya; Astrel', 2010. 895 s.
Sinel'nikova L. N. Rizoma i diskurs intermedial'nosti // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. № 21 (4). S. 805-821.
Torlopova L. A. Genealogiya ponyatiya invalidnosti // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. № 37. S. 92-102.
Beaudry J.-S. Theoretical Strategies to Define Disability // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability / ed. by D. T. Wasserman, A. Cureton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. P. 3-21.
Bickenbach J. Disability, Health, and Difference // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability / ed. by D. T. Wasserman, A. Cureton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. P. 46-62.
Chapman R. Neurodiversity, disability, wellbeing // Neurodiversity Studies / ed. by H. Bertilsdotter-Rosqvist, N. Chown, A. Stenning. Abington-on-Thames: Routledge, 2020. P. 57-72.
Cieza A., Sabariego C., Bickenbach J., Chatterji S. Rethinking Disability [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-1002-6 (data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2021).
Corker M., Shakespeare T. Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory. L. - N. Y.: Continuum, 2002. 249 p.
Couser G. T. Disability as diversity: A difference with a difference // Ilha do Desterro. A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies. 2005. № 48. P. 95-113.
Davis L. Bending over backwards: disability dismodernism and other difficult positions. N. Y.: New York University Press, 2002. 200 p.
Davis L. Why Is Disability Missing From the Discourse on Diversity? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.chronicle.com/article/why-is-disability-missing-from-the-discourse-on-diversity/?cid=gen_sign_in (data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2021).
Disability: Health, Well-Being, and Personal Relationships [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2016/entries/disability-health/(data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2021).
Gadamer H. G. The Enigma of Health. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996. 180 p.
Goodley D., Hughes B., Davis L. Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 336 p.
Pfeiffer D. The conceptualization of disability // Research in Social Science and Disability. 2001. № 2. P. 29-52.
Pfieffer D. The philosophical foundations of disability studies // Disability studies quarterly. 2002. Vol. 22. № 2. P. 3-23.
Shakespeare T. Still a health issue // Disability and Health Journal. 2012. Vol. 5. Issue 3. P. 129-131.
Watson N. Well, I Know this is Going to Sound Very Strange to You, but I Don’t See Myself as a Disabled Person: identity and disability // Disability & Society. 2002. Vol. 17. No. 5. P. 509-527.
Zola I. K. Toward the Necessary Universalizing of a Disability Policy // Milbank Q. 2005. № 83 (4). P. 401-428.