GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2022. № 5. P. 1364-1369.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220273

"The Jester" by Yu. Vyazemsky vs "The Jester" by A. Eshpai: Specificity of Cinema Interpretation of a Literary Character’s Image

Osmukhina Olga Yurievna, Ovsyannikova Ekaterina Pavlovna
N. P. Ogarev Mordovian State University


Submitted: 08.04.2022
Abstract. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comparative-contrastive analysis of the understanding of the protagonist’s image and his path in Yu. Vyazemsky’s novella "The Jester" and in its film adaptation of the same name. Scientific originality is determined by the fact that it is the first time that the novella is introduced into scientific use and considered through the lens of an interdisciplinary approach. As a result, it has been found, firstly, that while the literary text continues the tradition of the Bildungsroman (stadiality of the hero’s path, his interaction with "teachers", gradual internal formation and "purification" in death), the screen narrative is constructed as a psychological drama with an alternative ending compared to the source material; secondly, the image of the protagonist, who does not undergo an internal metamorphosis, remaining cruel, is transformed in the cinema interpretation of "The Jester".
Key words and phrases: Ю. Вяземский, русская проза ХХ века, традиция, роман воспитания, кинематографическая интерпретация, Yu. Vyazemsky, Russian prose of the XX century, tradition, Bildungsroman, cinema interpretation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Arutyunyan S. M. Ekranizatsiya literaturnykh proizvedenii kak spetsificheskii tip vzaimodeistviya iskusstv: diss. … k. filos. n. M., 2003.
  2. Bazen A. Chto takoe kino? M.: Iskusstvo, 1972.
  3. Bakhtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975.
  4. Vyazemskii Yu. P. Esli stolknesh'sya s soboi… M.: Astrel'; AST, 2011.
  5. Dal' V. I. Tolkovyi slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: v 4-kh t. M.: Terra, 1995. T. 4. R - V.
  6. Kaspe I. M. Rukopisi khranyatsya vechno: teleserialy i literatura. 2006. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2006/2/rukopisi-hranyatsya-vechno-teleserialy-i-literatura.html
  7. Kuryaev I. R. Kino-interpretatsiya pozdnei prozy I. Turgeneva v otechestvennom dorevolyutsionnom kinematografe ("Klara Milich" I. Turgeneva vs "Posle smerti" E. Bauera) // Ural'skii filologicheskii vestnik. Seriya "Russkaya klassika: dinamika khudozhestvennykh sistem". 2017. Vyp. 9.
  8. Kuryaev I. R. Sokurov vs Platonov: kinematograficheskaya obraznost' "Reki Potudan'" // Andrei Platonov i khudozhestvennye iskaniya XX veka: problemy retseptsii: sb. nauch. tr. / pod red. T. A. Nikonovoi. Voronezh: Nauka-Yunipress, 2019.
  9. Kuryaev I. R., Os'mukhina O. Yu. Sintez komiksa i nuar-stilistiki v serii "graficheskikh romanov" F. Millera "Sin City": k probleme reinterpretatsii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2018. № 3-1 (81).
  10. Manevich I. M. Kino i literatura. M.: Iskusstvo, 1966.
  11. Mart'yanova I. A. Kinematograf russkogo teksta. SPb.: Svoe izdatel'stvo, 2011.
  12. Nemchenko L. Ekranizatsiya kak pole interpretatsii // Toronto Slavic Quarterly. 2013. № 44 (Spring).
  13. Oliz'ko N. S. Intermedial'nost' kak raznovidnost' interdiskursivnykh otnoshenii // Mirovaya literatura v kontekste kul'tury. 2008. № 3.
  14. Os'mukhina O. Yu., Kuryaev I. R. Spetsifika prelomleniya traditsii romana vospitaniya v proze M. Shishkina (na materiale "Zapisok Larionova") // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2016. № 3.
  15. Pogozheva L. P. Ekranizatsiya literaturnykh proizvedenii // Iskusstvo kino. 1961. № 10.
  16. Soldatkina Ya. V. Literatura v zvuke, tsvete, dvizhenii: istoriko-literaturnye osnovy mediaslovesnosti. M. - Berlin: Direkt-Media, 2019.
  17. Timashkov A. Yu. Intermedial'nost' kak avtorskaya strategiya v evropeiskoi khudozhestvennoi kul'ture rubezha XIX-XX vekov: avtoref. diss. … k. isk. SPb., 2012.
  18. Tishunina N. V. Zapadnoevropeiskii simvolizm i problema vzaimodeistviya iskusstv: opyt intermedial'nogo analiza. SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 1998.
  19. Fasmer M. Uspenie // Fasmer M. Etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka. 1964-1973. URL: https://gufo.me/dict/vasmer
  20. Fradkin L. Z. Ekranizatsiya russkogo klassicheskogo romana i problemy montazha. M.: Iskusstvo, 1971.
  21. Khaminova A. A., Zil'berman N. N. Teoriya intermedial'nosti v kontekste sovremennoi gumanitarnoi nauki // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 389.
  22. Yampol'skii M. B. Pamyat' Tiresiya. Intertekstual'nost' i kinematograf. M.: Kul'tura, 1993.
  23. Osmukhina O. Yu., Kuryaev I. R. Literature and Cinema: Aspects of Interaction // Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2018. Vol. 7. Iss. 3.
  24. Rajewsky I. O.Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality // Intermedialites. 2005. № 6. URL: http://cri.histart.umontreal.ca/cri/fr/intermedialites/p6/pdfs/p6_rajewsky_text.pdf
  25. Stam R. Beyond Fidelity: The Dialogics of Adaptation // Film Adaptation: An Anthology / ed. and with an introd. by J. Naremore. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2000.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru