Non-Trivial Types of Semantic Derivation in Colloquial and Youth Vocabulary of the Modern German Language
Bojkova Irina Borissovna
Moscow Pedagogical State University
Submitted: 16.06.2022
Abstract. The aim of this article is to determine the semantic-cognitive status of new colloquial meanings that have not received attention of traditional typology. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying several non-trivial types of semantic derivation - independent and dependent, determining their relationship with other types of semantic derivation, as well as in describing a cognitive mechanism for creating new nominations. As a result, the relative independence of the linguistic processes of derivation and linguistic thinking of the German youth is shown.
Key words and phrases: нетривиальные типы семантической деривации, самостоятельные и несамостоятельные типы семантической деривации, коллоквиальная лексика современного немецкого языка, ребрендинг, когнитивный аспект семантической деривации, non-trivial types of semantic derivation, independent and dependent types of semantic derivation, colloquial vocabulary of the modern German language, rebranding, cognitive aspect of semantic derivation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Birikh A. K. Metonimiya v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Semanticheskii i grammaticheskii aspekty. Myunkhen: Otto Sanger, 1995.
Vol'f E. M. Grammatika i semantika prilagatel'nogo (na materiale ibero-romanskikh yazykov). M.: Nauka, 1978.
Ginzburg E. L. Konstruktsii polisemii v russkom yazyke. Taksonomiya i metonimiya. M.: Nauka, 1985.
Karpova O. S., Rakhilina E. V., Reznikova T. I., Ryzhova D. A. Otsenochnye znacheniya rebrendingovogo tipa (po materialam Bazy dannykh semanticheskikh perekhodov v kachestvennykh prilagatel'nykh i narechiyakh). 2011. URL: https://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2011/materials/ru/pdf/30.pdf
Kustova G. I. Tipy proizvodnykh znachenii i mekhanizmy yazykovogo rasshireniya. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2004.
Merzlyakova A. Kh. Tipy semanticheskogo var'irovaniya prilagatel'nykh polya "Vospriyatie" (na materiale angliiskogo, russkogo i frantsuzskogo yazykov). M.: Editorial URSS, 2003.
Rakhilina E. V., Karpova O. S., Reznikova T. I. Semanticheskie perekhody v atributivnykh konstruktsiyakh: metafora, metonimiya i rebrending // Lingvistika konstruktsii / otv. red. E. V. Rakhilina. M.: Azbukovnik, 2010. URL: https://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2009/materials/html/65.htm
Rezanova N. I. Metonimicheskoe var'irovanie semantiki angliiskikh prilagatel'nykh: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. L., 1986.
Sandakova M. V. Metonimiya prilagatel'nogo v russkom yazyke: diss. … d. filol. n. M., 2004.
Shmelev D. N. Problemy semanticheskogo analiza leksiki. Izd-e 4-e. M.: LENAND, 2017.
Androutsopoulos J. K. Wie sagt man ‘sehr gut’ in der Jugendsprache? 1998. URL: https://jannisandroutsopoulos.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/wie-sagt-man-sehr-gut-in-der-jugendsprache.pdf
Barcelona A. Clarifying and Applying the Notions of Metaphor and Metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics. Atlantis: AEDEAN. 1997. Vol. 19. No. 1.
Blank A. Einf?hrung in die lexikalische Semantik f?r Romanisten. T?bingen: Max Niemeyer, 2001.
DUDEN - Das gro?e W?rterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 4. Aufl. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut GmbH, 2012.
Heine M. Das w?re das "Jugendwort des Jahres" geworden. 2019. URL: https://www.welt.de/kultur/article202079488/Sprache-Das-waere-das-Jugendwort-des-Jahres-geworden.html
Peirsman Y., Geeraerts D. Metonymy as a Prototypical Category // Cognitive Linguistics. 2006. Vol. 17 (3).
Русский
